<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: InSANIty &#8230; Part the First</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/</link>
	<description>The Obsessive Study Of Athletics Aesthetics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 03:52:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335614</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335614</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;335599&quot;]roth &amp; hagar were never in VH at the same time (tho they did tour together) and i can&#039;t drive 55 was released as a solo work by sammy a year &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.songfacts.com/detail.php?id=1614&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;before&lt;/a&gt; he joined the band

but yes, nike OWNS converse, much in the same way as the red sox own the yankees[/quote]

Phil, I believe Sammay Hagar was playing &quot;55&quot; years before he ever oined VH.  I saw a &quot;Day of Rock-n-Roll&quot; all-day concert in 1979-1980 with Van Halen playing and Sammy Hagar opening where I&#039;m pretty certain his band played that song.

This was many years before David Lee Roth left VH.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">LI Phil said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335599"><p>
roth &amp; hagar were never in VH at the same time (tho they did tour together) and i can&#8217;t drive 55 was released as a solo work by sammy a year <a href="http://www.songfacts.com/detail.php?id=1614" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">before</a> he joined the band</p>
<p>but yes, nike OWNS converse, much in the same way as the red sox own the yankees</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Phil, I believe Sammay Hagar was playing &#8220;55&#8243; years before he ever oined VH.  I saw a &#8220;Day of Rock-n-Roll&#8221; all-day concert in 1979-1980 with Van Halen playing and Sammy Hagar opening where I&#8217;m pretty certain his band played that song.</p>
<p>This was many years before David Lee Roth left VH.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris in DC</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335613</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris in DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335613</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;335541&quot;][quote comment=&quot;335508&quot;]I was at Phils/Jays last night as well

The Jays were wearing these caps

http://shop.mlb.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2617747&amp;cp=1452370.1452930.703248

what the hell is that?

hideous[/quote]
I thought that cap was limited to Spring Training only.

And I agree, no matter what time of year that&#039;s a hideous look for a major-leaguer (speaking of the Spring Training caps as a group).[/quote]

Yeah, each team has been wearing that cap in Spring Training as well as pre-game BP for 3 seasons now. I&#039;ll have to add that they&#039;re VERY comfortable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">anotherguy said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335541">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">TommyD said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335508"><p>
I was at Phils/Jays last night as well</p>
<p>The Jays were wearing these caps</p>
<p><a href="http://shop.mlb.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2617747&amp;cp=1452370.1452930.703248" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://shop.mlb.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2617747&amp;cp=1452370.1452930.703248' target="_blank">http://shop.mlb.com/...</a></p>
<p>what the hell is that?</p>
<p>hideous</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I thought that cap was limited to Spring Training only.</p>
<p>And I agree, no matter what time of year that&#8217;s a hideous look for a major-leaguer (speaking of the Spring Training caps as a group).</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yeah, each team has been wearing that cap in Spring Training as well as pre-game BP for 3 seasons now. I&#8217;ll have to add that they&#8217;re VERY comfortable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimV19</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335612</link>
		<dc:creator>JimV19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335612</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;335611&quot;]I was going to say that I&#039;m more into suggestions for MLB socks with stripes on them:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Athletics09socks.png&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A&#039;s&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/DBacks09socks.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Diamondbacks&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Giants09socks.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Giants&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Marlins09socks.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Marlins&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Pirates09socks.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pirate&#039;s&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Royals09socks.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Royals&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Senators09socks.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nationals&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Twins09socks.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Twin&#039;s&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/WhiteSox09socks.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;White Sox&lt;/a&gt;
.[/quote]

I really like the 3-stripes look on the A&#039;s, Giants and Pirates.  Using the 2nd color in that manner takes a plain uniform and suddenly makes it all some worthwhile (to paraphrase a line from the Mary Tyler Moore theme song).  I&#039;d like to see that design on the other teams as well.  Oh, and could you put the old teal hat with black brim on the Marlins guy???  Good stuff, Michael.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Michael Emody said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335611"><p>
I was going to say that I&#8217;m more into suggestions for MLB socks with stripes on them:</p>
<p><a href="http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Athletics09socks.png" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">A&#8217;s</a><br />
<a href="http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/DBacks09socks.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Diamondbacks</a><br />
<a href="http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Giants09socks.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Giants</a><br />
<a href="http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Marlins09socks.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Marlins</a><br />
<a href="http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Pirates09socks.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Pirate&#8217;s</a><br />
<a href="http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Royals09socks.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Royals</a><br />
<a href="http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Senators09socks.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Nationals</a><br />
<a href="http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Twins09socks.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Twin&#8217;s</a><br />
<a href="http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/WhiteSox09socks.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">White Sox</a><br />
.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I really like the 3-stripes look on the A&#8217;s, Giants and Pirates.  Using the 2nd color in that manner takes a plain uniform and suddenly makes it all some worthwhile (to paraphrase a line from the Mary Tyler Moore theme song).  I&#8217;d like to see that design on the other teams as well.  Oh, and could you put the old teal hat with black brim on the Marlins guy???  Good stuff, Michael.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Emody</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335611</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Emody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335611</guid>
		<description>I was going to say that I&#039;m more into suggestions for MLB socks with stripes on them:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Athletics09socks.png&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A&#039;s&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/DBacks09socks.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Diamondbacks&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Giants09socks.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Giants&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Marlins09socks.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Marlins&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Pirates09socks.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pirate&#039;s&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Royals09socks.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Royals&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Senators09socks.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nationals&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Twins09socks.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Twin&#039;s&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/WhiteSox09socks.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;White Sox&lt;/a&gt;
.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to say that I&#8217;m more into suggestions for MLB socks with stripes on them:</p>
<p><a href="http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Athletics09socks.png" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">A&#8217;s</a><br />
<a href="http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/DBacks09socks.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Diamondbacks</a><br />
<a href="http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Giants09socks.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Giants</a><br />
<a href="http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Marlins09socks.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Marlins</a><br />
<a href="http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Pirates09socks.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Pirate&#8217;s</a><br />
<a href="http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Royals09socks.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Royals</a><br />
<a href="http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Senators09socks.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Nationals</a><br />
<a href="http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/Twins09socks.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Twin&#8217;s</a><br />
<a href="http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc60/Chilatesleeper/WhiteSox09socks.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">White Sox</a><br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BW Radley</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335610</link>
		<dc:creator>BW Radley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335610</guid>
		<description>The Hilda you thought was a Milwaukee Braves fan was actually Hilda Chester, a very well-known Brooklyn Dodger fan of the 1940&#039;s and 1950&#039;s.  (See http://www.baseballreliquary.org/HildaChester.htm)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Hilda you thought was a Milwaukee Braves fan was actually Hilda Chester, a very well-known Brooklyn Dodger fan of the 1940&#8217;s and 1950&#8217;s.  (See <a href="http://www.baseballreliquary.org/HildaChester.htm)" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.baseballreliquary.org/HildaChester.htm' target="_blank">http://www.baseballr...</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Emody</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335609</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Emody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335609</guid>
		<description>I think the guy to Sammy Hagar&#039;s right is Texas comic Bill Engvall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the guy to Sammy Hagar&#8217;s right is Texas comic Bill Engvall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LI Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335608</link>
		<dc:creator>LI Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335608</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;335607&quot;][quote comment=&quot;335599&quot;]roth &amp; hagar were never in VH at the same time (tho they did tour together) and i can&#039;t drive 55 was released as a solo work by sammy a year &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.songfacts.com/detail.php?id=1614&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;before&lt;/a&gt; he joined the band

but yes, nike OWNS converse, much in the same way as the red sox own the yankees[/quote]

Oooh, quote of the day.

And yes, hanging with VH (1988?) was as fun as it looks:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v247/brinkeguthrie/scan0023.jpg[/quote]

whoa...brinke...that you with the glasses tucked into the sweater?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">=bg= said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335607">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">LI Phil said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335599"><p>
roth &amp; hagar were never in VH at the same time (tho they did tour together) and i can&#8217;t drive 55 was released as a solo work by sammy a year <a href="http://www.songfacts.com/detail.php?id=1614" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">before</a> he joined the band</p>
<p>but yes, nike OWNS converse, much in the same way as the red sox own the yankees</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Oooh, quote of the day.</p>
<p>And yes, hanging with VH (1988?) was as fun as it looks:</p>
<p><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v247/brinkeguthrie/scan0023.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v247/brinkeguthrie/scan0023.jpg' target="_blank">http://img.photobuck...</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>whoa&#8230;brinke&#8230;that you with the glasses tucked into the sweater?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: =bg=</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335607</link>
		<dc:creator>=bg=</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335607</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;335599&quot;]roth &amp; hagar were never in VH at the same time (tho they did tour together) and i can&#039;t drive 55 was released as a solo work by sammy a year &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.songfacts.com/detail.php?id=1614&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;before&lt;/a&gt; he joined the band

but yes, nike OWNS converse, much in the same way as the red sox own the yankees[/quote]

Oooh, quote of the day.

And yes, hanging with VH (1988?) was as fun as it looks:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v247/brinkeguthrie/scan0023.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">LI Phil said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335599"><p>
roth &amp; hagar were never in VH at the same time (tho they did tour together) and i can&#8217;t drive 55 was released as a solo work by sammy a year <a href="http://www.songfacts.com/detail.php?id=1614" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">before</a> he joined the band</p>
<p>but yes, nike OWNS converse, much in the same way as the red sox own the yankees</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Oooh, quote of the day.</p>
<p>And yes, hanging with VH (1988?) was as fun as it looks:</p>
<p><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v247/brinkeguthrie/scan0023.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v247/brinkeguthrie/scan0023.jpg' target="_blank">http://img.photobuck...</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fight</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335605</link>
		<dc:creator>Fight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335605</guid>
		<description>Just finished watching the Reds game on FSN Ohio and in the post-game show it was &quot;leaked&quot; that the Reds will wear the 1964 home uniforms (seen here: http://exhibits.baseballhalloffame.org/dressed_to_the_nines/detail_page.asp?fileName=nl_1964_cincinnati.gif&amp;Entryid=1031)for the Civil Rights game.  Those are the ones with the names below the numbers on the back.  

I wonder if the White Sox will wear these babies:  http://exhibits.baseballhalloffame.org/dressed_to_the_nines/detail_page.asp?fileName=al_1964_chicago.gif&amp;Entryid=1030</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just finished watching the Reds game on FSN Ohio and in the post-game show it was &#8220;leaked&#8221; that the Reds will wear the 1964 home uniforms (seen here: <a href="http://exhibits.baseballhalloffame.org/dressed_to_the_nines/detail_page.asp?fileName=nl_1964_cincinnati.gif&amp;Entryid=1031)for" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://exhibits.baseballhalloffame.org/dressed_to_the_nines/detail_page.asp?fileName=nl_1964_cincinnati.gif&amp;Entryid=1031' target="_blank">http://exhibits.base...</a>)for the Civil Rights game.  Those are the ones with the names below the numbers on the back.  </p>
<p>I wonder if the White Sox will wear these babies:  <a href="http://exhibits.baseballhalloffame.org/dressed_to_the_nines/detail_page.asp?fileName=al_1964_chicago.gif&amp;Entryid=1030" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://exhibits.baseballhalloffame.org/dressed_to_the_nines/detail_page.asp?fileName=al_1964_chicago.gif&amp;Entryid=1030' target="_blank">http://exhibits.base...</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Engle</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335604</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Engle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335604</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;335602&quot;]I really enjoyed today\&#039;s post. I particularly liked the O\&#039;s, Royals, Tigers, and Jays. I think the Rays treatment could work too.

I know others have already brought it up, but the Halos never wore black except for the underbrim of their 5950\&#039;s as soon as they switched to their current color scheme. As for yellow, it only ever appeared as the color of the halo and the star on their California logo (which was worn as a sleeve patch), from the 70&#039;s and 80&#039;s.

That said, I wonder if someone could do a mock-up of the Halos with navy stirrups over red sanis, I&#039;d love to see it. Somehow I don&#039;t think silver would work.[/quote]
Looking ahead to the National League equivalent of this game, I&#039;m curious to see how khaki sanis would look under black or brick red stirrups for the Astros.  Truth be told, it would probably look like hell with the gray pants, but at home, that would have a chance of looking good, because it would bring out the least used Astros color.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Jeremiah said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2009/06/17/insanity-part-the-first/#comment-335602"><p>
I really enjoyed today\&#8217;s post. I particularly liked the O\&#8217;s, Royals, Tigers, and Jays. I think the Rays treatment could work too.</p>
<p>I know others have already brought it up, but the Halos never wore black except for the underbrim of their 5950\&#8217;s as soon as they switched to their current color scheme. As for yellow, it only ever appeared as the color of the halo and the star on their California logo (which was worn as a sleeve patch), from the 70&#8217;s and 80&#8217;s.</p>
<p>That said, I wonder if someone could do a mock-up of the Halos with navy stirrups over red sanis, I&#8217;d love to see it. Somehow I don&#8217;t think silver would work.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Looking ahead to the National League equivalent of this game, I&#8217;m curious to see how khaki sanis would look under black or brick red stirrups for the Astros.  Truth be told, it would probably look like hell with the gray pants, but at home, that would have a chance of looking good, because it would bring out the least used Astros color.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
