<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday Morning Uni Watch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/</link>
	<description>The Obsessive Study Of Athletics Aesthetics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:25:38 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DenverGregg</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297192</link>
		<dc:creator>DenverGregg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297192</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;297064&quot;]Don&#039;t know if anyone&#039;s seen this, but the Colorado Springs Sky Sox have unveiled a new logo/color scheme.  Seems pretty generic minor league kinda stuff:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/index.jsp?sid=t551[/quote]
Good catch of bad news.  The old Sky Sox look was unique (Green and Silver, great cap logo).  Now they&#039;re one of about eight thousand pro baseball teams to wear RWB.  Nothing wrong with RWB, but it is nice to see a team wear something else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Tyler said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297064"><p>
Don&#8217;t know if anyone&#8217;s seen this, but the Colorado Springs Sky Sox have unveiled a new logo/color scheme.  Seems pretty generic minor league kinda stuff:</p>
<p><a href="http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/index.jsp?sid=t551" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/index.jsp?sid=t551' target="_blank">http://web.minorleag...</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Good catch of bad news.  The old Sky Sox look was unique (Green and Silver, great cap logo).  Now they&#8217;re one of about eight thousand pro baseball teams to wear RWB.  Nothing wrong with RWB, but it is nice to see a team wear something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LarenR</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297191</link>
		<dc:creator>LarenR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297191</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;297187&quot;][quote comment=&quot;297174&quot;][quote comment=&quot;297173&quot;][quote]Apparently the announcers don’t get it…they kept saying that if Pena hadn’t batted in that run, then that would’ve been it for the Rays cuz MLB would’ve called it and the Phils would’ve won. Obviously, MLB would have NEVER called the game if one team had the lead…they were just praying for a tie at the end of the inning.[/quote]

either that or you would have had the longest rain delay in history...no way were they gonna decide a world series in a six inning game[/quote]

There is nothing in the book that says “these are the rules, except when it’s the last game of the World Series”.[/quote]

Apparently there is.[/quote]
Yeah, apparently there is.  Check near the end of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/10/27/SPUI13OU1E.DTL&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; for this tidbit: &quot;Selig said he determined [before the game] Saturday in consultation with the two general managers, Philadelphia&#039;s Pat Gillick and Tampa Bay&#039;s Andrew Friedman, that the Series would not end on a yellow, as the NASCAR kids like to say.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Lwiedy said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297187">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">Lwiedy said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297174">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">LI Phil said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297173">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">LarenR said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-"><p>
Apparently the announcers don’t get it…they kept saying that if Pena hadn’t batted in that run, then that would’ve been it for the Rays cuz MLB would’ve called it and the Phils would’ve won. Obviously, MLB would have NEVER called the game if one team had the lead…they were just praying for a tie at the end of the inning.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>either that or you would have had the longest rain delay in history&#8230;no way were they gonna decide a world series in a six inning game</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There is nothing in the book that says “these are the rules, except when it’s the last game of the World Series”.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Apparently there is.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yeah, apparently there is.  Check near the end of <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/10/27/SPUI13OU1E.DTL" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">this article</a> for this tidbit: &#8220;Selig said he determined [before the game] Saturday in consultation with the two general managers, Philadelphia&#8217;s Pat Gillick and Tampa Bay&#8217;s Andrew Friedman, that the Series would not end on a yellow, as the NASCAR kids like to say.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff P</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297190</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 05:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297190</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;297177&quot;][quote]you can’t change the rules on the fly. &lt;b&gt;It would be tantamount to fraud&lt;/b&gt;. They are RULES not suggestions. There is nothing in the book that says “these are the rules, except when it’s the last game of the World Series”.[/quote]

while i agree with you, much like the 2000 election, you&#039;d have half the nation thinking they wuz robbed...even after they went back and counted all the votes after the supreme court decision (and bush &lt;i&gt;still&lt;/i&gt; won), mlb would have had a HUGE black eye

i think they would have tried to get a full 9 innings in even if it meant restarting the game at 2 am[/quote]
Not quite. If they counted by the standards Gore was pushing for, Bush would have won. If they counted by the standards Bush wanted, Gore would have won.

And that&#039;s your little political trivia tidbit for today...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">LI Phil said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297177">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">Jeff P said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-"><p>
you can’t change the rules on the fly. <b>It would be tantamount to fraud</b>. They are RULES not suggestions. There is nothing in the book that says “these are the rules, except when it’s the last game of the World Series”.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>while i agree with you, much like the 2000 election, you&#8217;d have half the nation thinking they wuz robbed&#8230;even after they went back and counted all the votes after the supreme court decision (and bush <i>still</i> won), mlb would have had a HUGE black eye</p>
<p>i think they would have tried to get a full 9 innings in even if it meant restarting the game at 2 am</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Not quite. If they counted by the standards Gore was pushing for, Bush would have won. If they counted by the standards Bush wanted, Gore would have won.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s your little political trivia tidbit for today&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Engle</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297189</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Engle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 05:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297189</guid>
		<description>So if the Phillies lose this two-day game because of the rain and the city&#039;s fans need to call it a &quot;scandal&quot; to make themselves feel better, can we call it &quot;Floodgate?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if the Phillies lose this two-day game because of the rain and the city&#8217;s fans need to call it a &#8220;scandal&#8221; to make themselves feel better, can we call it &#8220;Floodgate?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LI Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297188</link>
		<dc:creator>LI Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297188</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;297187&quot;][quote comment=&quot;297174&quot;]
There is nothing in the book that says “these are the rules, except when it’s the last game of the World Series”.[/quote]

Apparently there is.[/quote]

there is NOW

bud just changed 150 years of history (or WOULD have if pena hadn&#039;t saved his ass)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Lwiedy said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297187">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">Lwiedy said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297174">
<p>There is nothing in the book that says “these are the rules, except when it’s the last game of the World Series”.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Apparently there is.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>there is NOW</p>
<p>bud just changed 150 years of history (or WOULD have if pena hadn&#8217;t saved his ass)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lwiedy</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297187</link>
		<dc:creator>Lwiedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297187</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;297174&quot;][quote comment=&quot;297173&quot;][quote]Apparently the announcers don’t get it…they kept saying that if Pena hadn’t batted in that run, then that would’ve been it for the Rays cuz MLB would’ve called it and the Phils would’ve run. Obviously, MLB would have NEVER called the game if one team had the lead…they were just praying for a tie at the end of the inning.[/quote]

either that or you would have had the longest rain delay in history...no way were they gonna decide a world series in a six inning game[/quote]

There is nothing in the book that says “these are the rules, except when it’s the last game of the World Series”.[/quote]

Apparently there is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Lwiedy said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297174">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">LI Phil said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297173">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">Lwiedy said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-"><p>
Apparently the announcers don’t get it…they kept saying that if Pena hadn’t batted in that run, then that would’ve been it for the Rays cuz MLB would’ve called it and the Phils would’ve run. Obviously, MLB would have NEVER called the game if one team had the lead…they were just praying for a tie at the end of the inning.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>either that or you would have had the longest rain delay in history&#8230;no way were they gonna decide a world series in a six inning game</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There is nothing in the book that says “these are the rules, except when it’s the last game of the World Series”.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Apparently there is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuby</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297186</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297186</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;297185&quot;]Phil, Paul:
http://ak.buy.com/db_assets/large_images/055/205131055.jpg[/quote]
At least there&#039;s no black.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">MPowers1634 said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297185"><p>
Phil, Paul:<br />
<a href="http://ak.buy.com/db_assets/large_images/055/205131055.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://ak.buy.com/db_assets/large_images/055/205131055.jpg' target="_blank">http://ak.buy.com/db...</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>At least there&#8217;s no black.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MPowers1634</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297185</link>
		<dc:creator>MPowers1634</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297185</guid>
		<description>Phil, Paul:
http://ak.buy.com/db_assets/large_images/055/205131055.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil, Paul:<br />
<a href="http://ak.buy.com/db_assets/large_images/055/205131055.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://ak.buy.com/db_assets/large_images/055/205131055.jpg' target="_blank">http://ak.buy.com/db...</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JTH</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297184</link>
		<dc:creator>JTH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297184</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;297181&quot;][quote comment=&quot;297178&quot;]they did not count all votes in 2000[/quote]

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/12/politics/recount/12ASSE.html?ex=1225252800&amp;en=b48d02a2192b6151&amp;ei=5070&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;yes they did&lt;/a&gt;...it just wasn&#039;t widely reported because it confirmed a bush victory...something the media has, to this day, neither forgotten nor forgiven

from that article:

[quote] the analysis concluded that ... even if the Supreme Court had not stepped in to block a statewide manual recount, Mr. Bush would have won.[/quote][/quote]
Also in that article is something that seems almost like a foreign concept today:
[quote]...how do you challenge a president who is basking in job approval ratings of close to 90 percent?[/quote]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">LI Phil said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297181">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">Ryan said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297178"><p>
they did not count all votes in 2000</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/12/politics/recount/12ASSE.html?ex=1225252800&amp;en=b48d02a2192b6151&amp;ei=5070" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">yes they did</a>&#8230;it just wasn&#8217;t widely reported because it confirmed a bush victory&#8230;something the media has, to this day, neither forgotten nor forgiven</p>
<p>from that article:</p>
<p class="quoter_comment_header">JTH said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-"><p>
 the analysis concluded that &#8230; even if the Supreme Court had not stepped in to block a statewide manual recount, Mr. Bush would have won.</p>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p>Also in that article is something that seems almost like a foreign concept today:</p>
<p class="quoter_comment_header">JTH said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-"><p>
&#8230;how do you challenge a president who is basking in job approval ratings of close to 90 percent?</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terri</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297183</link>
		<dc:creator>Terri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/10/27/monday-morning-uni-watch-23/#comment-297183</guid>
		<description>So they&#039;re going to start at 8pm, no matter what day it is...tentatively tommorrow, but the weather is still supposed to be terrible. According to Selig &quot;We&#039;ll stay here even if we have to celebrate Thanksgiving here.&quot; 

So what are the odds that weather.com crashes from so many hits on Philly&#039;s forecast?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So they&#8217;re going to start at 8pm, no matter what day it is&#8230;tentatively tommorrow, but the weather is still supposed to be terrible. According to Selig &#8220;We&#8217;ll stay here even if we have to celebrate Thanksgiving here.&#8221; </p>
<p>So what are the odds that weather.com crashes from so many hits on Philly&#8217;s forecast?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
