<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Well, at Least It&#8217;s More Legible Than the Last Version</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/</link>
	<description>The Obsessive Study Of Athletics Aesthetics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:25:38 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: max</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-283350</link>
		<dc:creator>max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 09:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-283350</guid>
		<description>Those have to be some of the weakest jerseys I&#039;ve ever seen. What is that stupid triangle thing by the collar? I&#039;m not really surprised though, because it seems like for several years now they have had the worst Uni&#039;s in the league.

I know you hate that Kings one too. Personally I hate teal on a uni more than I hate purple

Why can&#039;t they make a uni that has all lower case letters. For instance, Helvetica in all lower case is nice and simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those have to be some of the weakest jerseys I&#8217;ve ever seen. What is that stupid triangle thing by the collar? I&#8217;m not really surprised though, because it seems like for several years now they have had the worst Uni&#8217;s in the league.</p>
<p>I know you hate that Kings one too. Personally I hate teal on a uni more than I hate purple</p>
<p>Why can&#8217;t they make a uni that has all lower case letters. For instance, Helvetica in all lower case is nice and simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Craven</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-282831</link>
		<dc:creator>James Craven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 05:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-282831</guid>
		<description>BTW, as per Oklahoma City&#039;s new unis, they&#039;ll be unveiled on Tuesday (8/5) alongt with the name and logo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, as per Oklahoma City&#8217;s new unis, they&#8217;ll be unveiled on Tuesday (8/5) alongt with the name and logo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Craven</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-282830</link>
		<dc:creator>James Craven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 05:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-282830</guid>
		<description>The Cramer Boards are trashing the designs from his ESPN column today:

http://boards.sportslogos.net/index.php?showtopic=60377

(P.S.: need to register if you don&#039;t belong.)

No love there needless to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Cramer Boards are trashing the designs from his ESPN column today:</p>
<p><a href="http://boards.sportslogos.net/index.php?showtopic=60377" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://boards.sportslogos.net/index.php?showtopic=60377' target="_blank">http://boards.sports...</a></p>
<p>(P.S.: need to register if you don&#8217;t belong.)</p>
<p>No love there needless to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-282829</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 04:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-282829</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;282735&quot;][quote comment=&quot;282734&quot;][quote comment=&quot;282733&quot;][quote comment=&quot;282658&quot;]Is that Rob Ullmann drawing for Rob Zurek of UW-LaCrosse hockey?![/quote]

Actually, no.  It&#039;s Loras College in Dubuque.  We used that logo for a few years.[/quote]

Oh, and we&#039;re the Duhawks.[/quote]

And woops...Mr. Ullman already answered the question.

I&#039;ll shut up now.[/quote]

Wow.  This was the last place I ever thought I would see my alma mater!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Robb Zurek said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-282735">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">Robb Zurek said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-282734">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">Robb Zurek said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-282733">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">Nicole said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-282658"><p>
Is that Rob Ullmann drawing for Rob Zurek of UW-LaCrosse hockey?!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Actually, no.  It&#8217;s Loras College in Dubuque.  We used that logo for a few years.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Oh, and we&#8217;re the Duhawks.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And woops&#8230;Mr. Ullman already answered the question.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll shut up now.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Wow.  This was the last place I ever thought I would see my alma mater!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanielDs</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-282828</link>
		<dc:creator>DanielDs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 04:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-282828</guid>
		<description>Manny is going to wear #28 for the Dodgers.

I work at a Dick&#039;s Sporting Goods, and I must say that prior to my employment i was never bothered by a logo creep, however, working in the Team Sports section has opened my eyes.  I was called over to the baseball apparel section the other day and asked &quot;don&#039;t you have any baseball socks that are just plain... like with no logo&#039;s on &#039;em?&quot;.  My thoughts immediately shifted to this blog and the recent discussion of the Phiten/Nike branded socks showing up in MLB.  I stared at the floor in shame and a sinking feeling grew in my stomach as I realized that Dick&#039;s Sporting Goods (one of the largest sporting goods chain in the US), in fact, did NOT have any baseball socks (Under Armour, ADIDAS, Nike) that did not display a visible logo when worn.  Maybe the logo creep is to blame for the long pajama pants... everyone is just tryin to cover em up?
Sigh... at least we don&#039;t sell the Phiten socks... yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manny is going to wear #28 for the Dodgers.</p>
<p>I work at a Dick&#8217;s Sporting Goods, and I must say that prior to my employment i was never bothered by a logo creep, however, working in the Team Sports section has opened my eyes.  I was called over to the baseball apparel section the other day and asked &#8220;don&#8217;t you have any baseball socks that are just plain&#8230; like with no logo&#8217;s on &#8216;em?&#8221;.  My thoughts immediately shifted to this blog and the recent discussion of the Phiten/Nike branded socks showing up in MLB.  I stared at the floor in shame and a sinking feeling grew in my stomach as I realized that Dick&#8217;s Sporting Goods (one of the largest sporting goods chain in the US), in fact, did NOT have any baseball socks (Under Armour, ADIDAS, Nike) that did not display a visible logo when worn.  Maybe the logo creep is to blame for the long pajama pants&#8230; everyone is just tryin to cover em up?<br />
Sigh&#8230; at least we don&#8217;t sell the Phiten socks&#8230; yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oilfan</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-282827</link>
		<dc:creator>oilfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 04:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-282827</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t know if this has been brought up before - but Alfredo Griffin was wearing a helmet with at least one earflap coaching 1B tonight for the Angels - was it a double earflap deal? First time I&#039;ve ever seen that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know if this has been brought up before &#8211; but Alfredo Griffin was wearing a helmet with at least one earflap coaching 1B tonight for the Angels &#8211; was it a double earflap deal? First time I&#8217;ve ever seen that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff P</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-282826</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 03:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-282826</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;282823&quot;]So are the Rangers finally getting rid of the hideous Lady Liberty?  What I really hate is the &quot;futuristic&quot; secondary shield logo.  http://tinyurl.com/5uovck[/quote]
where did you find that? A source would be nice.

And I liked those jerseys...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Ian said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-282823"><p>
So are the Rangers finally getting rid of the hideous Lady Liberty?  What I really hate is the &#8220;futuristic&#8221; secondary shield logo.  <a href="http://tinyurl.com/5uovck" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://tinyurl.com/5uovck' target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/5...</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>where did you find that? A source would be nice.</p>
<p>And I liked those jerseys&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-282825</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 02:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-282825</guid>
		<description>Couple of quick notes on the Yankee game tonight.
Pudge was still wearing his #7 cleats, and oddly the helmet he was wearing under his mask while catching only had the NY on the front, with no MLB logo on the back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couple of quick notes on the Yankee game tonight.<br />
Pudge was still wearing his #7 cleats, and oddly the helmet he was wearing under his mask while catching only had the NY on the front, with no MLB logo on the back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-282823</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-282823</guid>
		<description>So are the Rangers finally getting rid of the hideous Lady Liberty?  What I really hate is the &quot;futuristic&quot; secondary shield logo.  http://tinyurl.com/5uovck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So are the Rangers finally getting rid of the hideous Lady Liberty?  What I really hate is the &#8220;futuristic&#8221; secondary shield logo.  <a href="http://tinyurl.com/5uovck" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://tinyurl.com/5uovck' target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/5...</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-282822</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-282822</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;282821&quot;]Two things you don&#039;t see anymore:

Benches clearing

Pens in yellow

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLzZXmDGwF8[/quote]
Those penguins unis were awful...They looked like a hive of bees..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Kek said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/31/well-at-least-its-more-legible-than-the-last-version/#comment-282821"><p>
Two things you don&#8217;t see anymore:</p>
<p>Benches clearing</p>
<p>Pens in yellow</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLzZXmDGwF8" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLzZXmDGwF8' target="_blank">http://www.youtube.c...</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Those penguins unis were awful&#8230;They looked like a hive of bees..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
