<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WNBA Dress Code &#8230; Not Enforced (Non-existent?)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/</link>
	<description>The Obsessive Study Of Athletics Aesthetics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:25:38 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: P-Man</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282489</link>
		<dc:creator>P-Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282489</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;281988&quot;][quote comment=&quot;281987&quot;]Meh... those ladies&#039; clothing fits the &quot;don&#039;t look like an ass&quot; rule just fine, IMO... besides, isn&#039;t it summertime when comfort becomes more important?

The league&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wnba.com/media/suebird_625_080720.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;uniforms&lt;/a&gt;, however... Yecch![/quote]

My favorite things about that picture are the empty seats.[/quote]

That was pre-game...Fool!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">JoshP said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-281988">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">The Ol Goaler said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-281987"><p>
Meh&#8230; those ladies&#8217; clothing fits the &#8220;don&#8217;t look like an ass&#8221; rule just fine, IMO&#8230; besides, isn&#8217;t it summertime when comfort becomes more important?</p>
<p>The league&#8217;s <a href="http://www.wnba.com/media/suebird_625_080720.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">uniforms</a>, however&#8230; Yecch!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>My favorite things about that picture are the empty seats.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That was pre-game&#8230;Fool!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282131</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 03:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282131</guid>
		<description>The ladies from the WNBA look just fine to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ladies from the WNBA look just fine to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282070</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282070</guid>
		<description>Man, that Stockton Thunder logo is terrible.

It&#039;s what&#039;s exactly wrong with logo design these days ... they all look the same. Thick, modern, &quot;forward-motion&quot; typeface.

And that &quot;N&quot; trying to be lightning bolt?  Yikes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, that Stockton Thunder logo is terrible.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s what&#8217;s exactly wrong with logo design these days &#8230; they all look the same. Thick, modern, &#8220;forward-motion&#8221; typeface.</p>
<p>And that &#8220;N&#8221; trying to be lightning bolt?  Yikes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zach</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282067</link>
		<dc:creator>zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 08:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282067</guid>
		<description>Hmm, well Jayson Smith on ESPN Radio sure didn&#039;t mention the rumor business then.

Mah bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, well Jayson Smith on ESPN Radio sure didn&#8217;t mention the rumor business then.</p>
<p>Mah bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dilbert719</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282066</link>
		<dc:creator>dilbert719</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 07:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282066</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;282063&quot;][quote comment=&quot;281999&quot;][quote comment=&quot;281995&quot;]Changing topics, NBA down to 6 names:  Barons, Bison, Wind, Thunder, Marshalls(sic) and Energy.  ESPN points out it should be Marshals.  I think we can check off Wind(whoever came up with that name should be fired).  I like Bison, but think it will be nixed because we already have Bulls.  Energy would be an interesting pick, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s going to happen.  I do think Energy is the only one that sounds better with Oklahoma City as oppossed to just Oklahoma.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3505617[/quote]

Hell, I live in Oklahoma and I would like to see the Barons personally.  Marshals would be cool though, Marshalls would not.  I&#039;ll bet the only reason it was misspelled is because someone from Oklahoma submitted the name.[/quote]

I agree.  I rank the names:
1. Barons
2. Marshalls (or Marshals)
(drop off)
3. Thunder
4. Bison
(big drop off)
5. Energy
6. Wind[/quote]

...It&#039;s Thunder...this was announced last week.[/quote]

No, it was not. It was reported to be, according to a local OKC TV station, but that was not confirmed. Until the team announces it, it&#039;s a rumor. A speculative story at best.

These six trademark rights applications are fact, and it&#039;s a lock that one of these six will be it. Thunder seems the most likely, thanks to that news report. But it is not a given that they will choose that name.

And I hope they don&#039;t. The best name on the list is Barons. Marshals would be number two, if they spelled it correctly. The other four are terrible, and I hope they included them just to show people how much worse than Barons the choice could be.

I will maintain until my dying day, though, that the team should be named in honor of the man who made it all possible. Go with a royal blue/white/gold accent color scheme, and call them the Stars of David.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">zach said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282063">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">Dave said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-281999">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">Heath said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-281995"><p>
Changing topics, NBA down to 6 names:  Barons, Bison, Wind, Thunder, Marshalls(sic) and Energy.  ESPN points out it should be Marshals.  I think we can check off Wind(whoever came up with that name should be fired).  I like Bison, but think it will be nixed because we already have Bulls.  Energy would be an interesting pick, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s going to happen.  I do think Energy is the only one that sounds better with Oklahoma City as oppossed to just Oklahoma.</p>
<p><a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3505617" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3505617' target="_blank">http://sports.espn.g...</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Hell, I live in Oklahoma and I would like to see the Barons personally.  Marshals would be cool though, Marshalls would not.  I&#8217;ll bet the only reason it was misspelled is because someone from Oklahoma submitted the name.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I agree.  I rank the names:<br />
1. Barons<br />
2. Marshalls (or Marshals)<br />
(drop off)<br />
3. Thunder<br />
4. Bison<br />
(big drop off)<br />
5. Energy<br />
6. Wind</p>
</blockquote>
<p>&#8230;It&#8217;s Thunder&#8230;this was announced last week.</p>
<p>No, it was not. It was reported to be, according to a local OKC TV station, but that was not confirmed. Until the team announces it, it&#8217;s a rumor. A speculative story at best.</p>
<p>These six trademark rights applications are fact, and it&#8217;s a lock that one of these six will be it. Thunder seems the most likely, thanks to that news report. But it is not a given that they will choose that name.</p>
<p>And I hope they don&#8217;t. The best name on the list is Barons. Marshals would be number two, if they spelled it correctly. The other four are terrible, and I hope they included them just to show people how much worse than Barons the choice could be.</p>
<p>I will maintain until my dying day, though, that the team should be named in honor of the man who made it all possible. Go with a royal blue/white/gold accent color scheme, and call them the Stars of David.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cullan</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282065</link>
		<dc:creator>Cullan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 07:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282065</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;281995&quot;]Changing topics, NBA down to 6 names:  Barons, Bison, Wind, Thunder, Marshalls(sic) and Energy.  ESPN points out it should be Marshals.  I think we can check off Wind(whoever came up with that name should be fired).  I like Bison, but think it will be nixed because we already have Bulls.  Energy would be an interesting pick, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s going to happen.  I do think Energy is the only one that sounds better with Oklahoma City as oppossed to just Oklahoma.

Can&#039;t we just keep &#039;em the super sonics?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3505617[/quote]

Hell, I live in Oklahoma and I would like to see the Barons personally.  Marshals would be cool though, Marshalls would not.  I&#039;ll bet the only reason it was misspelled is because someone from Oklahoma submitted the name.[/quote]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Heath said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-281995"><p>
Changing topics, NBA down to 6 names:  Barons, Bison, Wind, Thunder, Marshalls(sic) and Energy.  ESPN points out it should be Marshals.  I think we can check off Wind(whoever came up with that name should be fired).  I like Bison, but think it will be nixed because we already have Bulls.  Energy would be an interesting pick, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s going to happen.  I do think Energy is the only one that sounds better with Oklahoma City as oppossed to just Oklahoma.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t we just keep &#8216;em the super sonics?<br />
<a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3505617" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3505617' target="_blank">http://sports.espn.g...</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Hell, I live in Oklahoma and I would like to see the Barons personally.  Marshals would be cool though, Marshalls would not.  I&#8217;ll bet the only reason it was misspelled is because someone from Oklahoma submitted the name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282064</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 05:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282064</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;282049&quot;][quote comment=&quot;282039&quot;]Does anyone collect the McFarlane sports action figures? I don&#039;t collect per say, but I do pick up all the Yankees and Patriots I can find. The figures are pretty good in small uniform details, especially in recent years, however I just noticed something interesting. In looking at the newly released Chien-Ming Wang (which is supposed to be in 2008 uniform, and has the ASG and Final Season patches) but it has the grey underbrim of the old wool 5950&#039;s. Just wondering do ay of the other new figures have this, or is it only Wang? A weird thing to ask I know..[/quote]
Does Wang just like to wear the old 5950&#039;s like Papelbon, or is it just an accident?[/quote]
Since the new caps came in last year, I&#039;ve never seen him wear an old one, and I do usually look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Chris said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282049">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">Brian said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282039"><p>
Does anyone collect the McFarlane sports action figures? I don&#8217;t collect per say, but I do pick up all the Yankees and Patriots I can find. The figures are pretty good in small uniform details, especially in recent years, however I just noticed something interesting. In looking at the newly released Chien-Ming Wang (which is supposed to be in 2008 uniform, and has the ASG and Final Season patches) but it has the grey underbrim of the old wool 5950&#8217;s. Just wondering do ay of the other new figures have this, or is it only Wang? A weird thing to ask I know..</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Does Wang just like to wear the old 5950&#8217;s like Papelbon, or is it just an accident?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Since the new caps came in last year, I&#8217;ve never seen him wear an old one, and I do usually look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zach</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282063</link>
		<dc:creator>zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 05:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282063</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;281999&quot;][quote comment=&quot;281995&quot;]Changing topics, NBA down to 6 names:  Barons, Bison, Wind, Thunder, Marshalls(sic) and Energy.  ESPN points out it should be Marshals.  I think we can check off Wind(whoever came up with that name should be fired).  I like Bison, but think it will be nixed because we already have Bulls.  Energy would be an interesting pick, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s going to happen.  I do think Energy is the only one that sounds better with Oklahoma City as oppossed to just Oklahoma.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3505617[/quote]

Hell, I live in Oklahoma and I would like to see the Barons personally.  Marshals would be cool though, Marshalls would not.  I&#039;ll bet the only reason it was misspelled is because someone from Oklahoma submitted the name.[/quote]

I agree.  I rank the names:
1. Barons
2. Marshalls (or Marshals)
(drop off)
3. Thunder
4. Bison
(big drop off)
5. Energy
6. Wind[/quote]


...It&#039;s Thunder...this was announced last week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Dave said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-281999">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">Heath said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-281995"><p>
Changing topics, NBA down to 6 names:  Barons, Bison, Wind, Thunder, Marshalls(sic) and Energy.  ESPN points out it should be Marshals.  I think we can check off Wind(whoever came up with that name should be fired).  I like Bison, but think it will be nixed because we already have Bulls.  Energy would be an interesting pick, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s going to happen.  I do think Energy is the only one that sounds better with Oklahoma City as oppossed to just Oklahoma.</p>
<p><a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3505617" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3505617' target="_blank">http://sports.espn.g...</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Hell, I live in Oklahoma and I would like to see the Barons personally.  Marshals would be cool though, Marshalls would not.  I&#8217;ll bet the only reason it was misspelled is because someone from Oklahoma submitted the name.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I agree.  I rank the names:<br />
1. Barons<br />
2. Marshalls (or Marshals)<br />
(drop off)<br />
3. Thunder<br />
4. Bison<br />
(big drop off)<br />
5. Energy<br />
6. Wind</p>
<p>&#8230;It&#8217;s Thunder&#8230;this was announced last week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282062</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 04:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282062</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;282059&quot;][quote comment=&quot;282054&quot;]I like the Trenton Logo.  Maybe if they decided to go with &quot;Thunder&quot; the can incoporate &quot;Thor&quot; into their logo.[/quote]

They wouldn&#039;t be the first.  The AFL2 team in Youngstown, Ohio has the same concept.

http://www.mahoningvalleythunder.com/images/news/Thunder%20Corporate%20Logo%20NEW.jpg[/quote]

don&#039;t forget the stockton thunder of the ECHL. they also encorporate the thor logo.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/b/b4/StocktonThunder.png/200px-StocktonThunder.png

BTW- i find it funny that their af2 team is the lightning.(a little bit of thunder, a little bit of lightning.[from the rundown])</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Mark Maxwell said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282059">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">Jim said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282054"><p>
I like the Trenton Logo.  Maybe if they decided to go with &#8220;Thunder&#8221; the can incoporate &#8220;Thor&#8221; into their logo.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>They wouldn&#8217;t be the first.  The AFL2 team in Youngstown, Ohio has the same concept.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mahoningvalleythunder.com/images/news/Thunder%20Corporate%20Logo%20NEW.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.mahoningvalleythunder.com/images/news/Thunder%20Corporate%20Logo%20NEW.jpg' target="_blank">http://www.mahoningv...</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>don&#8217;t forget the stockton thunder of the ECHL. they also encorporate the thor logo.</p>
<p><a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/b/b4/StocktonThunder.png/200px-StocktonThunder.png" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/b/b4/StocktonThunder.png/200px-StocktonThunder.png' target="_blank">http://upload.wikime...</a></p>
<p>BTW- i find it funny that their af2 team is the lightning.(a little bit of thunder, a little bit of lightning.[from the rundown])</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matteo</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282061</link>
		<dc:creator>Matteo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282061</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;282028&quot;]Ref the Oklahoma City NBA team, I think &quot;Thunder&quot; rolls off the tongue the smoothest. And it&#039;s appropriate for the area/region. Although,

Most the other choices for nicknames have been used before. Except for &quot;Energy&quot;, which sounds kinda silly when you say it a few times, and Marshall, or Marshalls...whichever they intended to use.

Other nicknames:

Barons (Cleveland, NHL)
Bison(s) (Buffalo, IL, Minor League Baseball)
Wind (Wichita, Central Hockey League)
Thunder (Portland, WFL)

The logo for the Wichita Wind was actually pretty cool...[/quote]
Everybody has it all rong. It should be the Oklahoma City Panhandlers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Timothy B said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/26/wnba-dress-code-not-enforced-non-existent/#comment-282028"><p>
Ref the Oklahoma City NBA team, I think &#8220;Thunder&#8221; rolls off the tongue the smoothest. And it&#8217;s appropriate for the area/region. Although,</p>
<p>Most the other choices for nicknames have been used before. Except for &#8220;Energy&#8221;, which sounds kinda silly when you say it a few times, and Marshall, or Marshalls&#8230;whichever they intended to use.</p>
<p>Other nicknames:</p>
<p>Barons (Cleveland, NHL)<br />
Bison(s) (Buffalo, IL, Minor League Baseball)<br />
Wind (Wichita, Central Hockey League)<br />
Thunder (Portland, WFL)</p>
<p>The logo for the Wichita Wind was actually pretty cool&#8230;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Everybody has it all rong. It should be the Oklahoma City Panhandlers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
