<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hmmm, Did Joseph Cooper Wear a Mask?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/</link>
	<description>The Obsessive Study Of Athletics Aesthetics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:25:38 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Deemer</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279322</link>
		<dc:creator>Deemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279322</guid>
		<description>I recall that the Bucco yearbook of 1976 was covered with red and white stipes and had Yosemite Sam on the cover.  Gerner did not start with the Pirates until 1977.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall that the Bucco yearbook of 1976 was covered with red and white stipes and had Yosemite Sam on the cover.  Gerner did not start with the Pirates until 1977.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279316</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279316</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;278996&quot;]The &quot;U&quot; will be on the field when U of M plays at Dolphins stadium but only after the Marlins&#039; season concludes.  So, they will have 2 football teams and baseball team all playing at the same place.  Has that been done before?  Chargers, Aztecs, Padres at Jack Murphy?

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/college/hurricanes/sfl-flspumlogo09sbjul09,0,4266075.story?track=rss[/quote]

The Louisiana Superdome has had two football teams (Saints, Tulane) and a basketball team (Jazz) in the same building in one season.

They&#039;ve also had Tulane baseball, but not as a full-time tenant (second paragraph):

http://www.signonsandiego.com/sports/aztecs/20040210-9999-1s10azbase.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Chris is Nashville said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-278996"><p>
The &#8220;U&#8221; will be on the field when U of M plays at Dolphins stadium but only after the Marlins&#8217; season concludes.  So, they will have 2 football teams and baseball team all playing at the same place.  Has that been done before?  Chargers, Aztecs, Padres at Jack Murphy?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/college/hurricanes/sfl-flspumlogo09sbjul09,0,4266075.story?track=rss" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/college/hurricanes/sfl-flspumlogo09sbjul09,0,4266075.story?track=rss' target="_blank">http://www.orlandose...</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>The Louisiana Superdome has had two football teams (Saints, Tulane) and a basketball team (Jazz) in the same building in one season.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve also had Tulane baseball, but not as a full-time tenant (second paragraph):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/sports/aztecs/20040210-9999-1s10azbase.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.signonsandiego.com/sports/aztecs/20040210-9999-1s10azbase.html' target="_blank">http://www.signonsan...</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279289</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279289</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;279222&quot;][quote comment=&quot;279205&quot;][quote comment=&quot;279202&quot;][quote comment=&quot;279039&quot;]
I’ll say it again: there are NO powder blue 69 White Sox road uni’s. They only exist on baseball cards. Some people think the color on the cards is correct.  I’m convinced it’s wrong.
[/quote]

Mightn&#039;t the Sox have switched unis during the season?[/quote]

The Sox went to a grey-ish uniform (same design as the power blues) in 1969 and 1970.  So I&#039;m sure the 1969 cards had tons of images of players wearing 1968 unis.[/quote]

Of course they did, but the &#039;68 Sox had Navy hats with the square S on the hat logo, and Navy letters and numbers edged in white on the road. &#039;69 hats, sleeves, etc. hats were Royal. Both &#039;69 and &#039;70 road lettering and numbers were white on the road. Hard to mistake either &#039;69 or &#039;70 for &#039;68.

In the past couple days someone here at U-W has said they have a &#039;69 road jersey that is a blue that could be mistaken for gray. And that&#039;s what I&#039;ve said...a very light blue not even as obvious as they&#039;d worn in &#039;68, and certainly nothing as intense as the double knit blue that came along in &#039;71. And it was different from all the other road unis in the league, which (except for the A&#039;s) were gray.

Yes, they certainly may have switched sometime in &#039;69.

But 1969 was my ninth year watching American League road uniforms in person, and what I saw ealry was a muted version of their previous blue in &#039;69 and return to gray (with Navy instead of Royal) in &#039;70.

Everyone here who has sat 15 feet from an entire team wearing the &#039;69 road uni, and then again in &#039;70, raise their hand.

Anyone else?

Gonna say this one more time. White Sox wore four different uniforms in four years (&#039;68, &#039;69, &#039;70 and &#039;71).

Here at Dressed to Nines...&#039;69 is detailed right, but colors wrong. Was Royal and white, with light blue road unis.

Even the Cooperstown sites sell a Royal blue hat, but they say was 68-69. Some think those years were Royal, some think Navy. What no one seems to grasp is that they are BOTH right. Royal one year; Navy the next. And that&#039;s where the confusion comes in.[/quote]

Actually, I think the Sox wore five different unis in five years (68-72). &#039;71 was the year they busted out the powder blue and red, but in&#039;71 they were flannel. In &#039;72 the design remained unchanged, but they switched to double-knit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Ricko said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279222">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">Christopher said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279205">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">Giancarlo said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279202">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">Michael Emody said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279039">
<p>I’ll say it again: there are NO powder blue 69 White Sox road uni’s. They only exist on baseball cards. Some people think the color on the cards is correct.  I’m convinced it’s wrong.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Mightn&#8217;t the Sox have switched unis during the season?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The Sox went to a grey-ish uniform (same design as the power blues) in 1969 and 1970.  So I&#8217;m sure the 1969 cards had tons of images of players wearing 1968 unis.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Of course they did, but the &#8216;68 Sox had Navy hats with the square S on the hat logo, and Navy letters and numbers edged in white on the road. &#8216;69 hats, sleeves, etc. hats were Royal. Both &#8216;69 and &#8216;70 road lettering and numbers were white on the road. Hard to mistake either &#8216;69 or &#8216;70 for &#8216;68.</p>
<p>In the past couple days someone here at U-W has said they have a &#8216;69 road jersey that is a blue that could be mistaken for gray. And that&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve said&#8230;a very light blue not even as obvious as they&#8217;d worn in &#8216;68, and certainly nothing as intense as the double knit blue that came along in &#8216;71. And it was different from all the other road unis in the league, which (except for the A&#8217;s) were gray.</p>
<p>Yes, they certainly may have switched sometime in &#8216;69.</p>
<p>But 1969 was my ninth year watching American League road uniforms in person, and what I saw ealry was a muted version of their previous blue in &#8216;69 and return to gray (with Navy instead of Royal) in &#8216;70.</p>
<p>Everyone here who has sat 15 feet from an entire team wearing the &#8216;69 road uni, and then again in &#8216;70, raise their hand.</p>
<p>Anyone else?</p>
<p>Gonna say this one more time. White Sox wore four different uniforms in four years (&#8217;68, &#8216;69, &#8216;70 and &#8216;71).</p>
<p>Here at Dressed to Nines&#8230;&#8217;69 is detailed right, but colors wrong. Was Royal and white, with light blue road unis.</p>
<p>Even the Cooperstown sites sell a Royal blue hat, but they say was 68-69. Some think those years were Royal, some think Navy. What no one seems to grasp is that they are BOTH right. Royal one year; Navy the next. And that&#8217;s where the confusion comes in.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Actually, I think the Sox wore five different unis in five years (68-72). &#8216;71 was the year they busted out the powder blue and red, but in&#8217;71 they were flannel. In &#8216;72 the design remained unchanged, but they switched to double-knit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chance</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279263</link>
		<dc:creator>chance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279263</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;279178&quot;][quote comment=&quot;279173&quot;][quote comment=&quot;279170&quot;]and the sleeve patch on this one is one of the best things i&#039;ve ever seen:
http://espn.go.com/i/magazine/new/uni_monuments.jpg
[/quote]

Couldn&#039;t agree more - that&#039;s amazing.  The Nationals should adopt that immediately.[/quote]

That sleeve patch was my favorite thing about the entire Nats design contest.[/quote]

And the beauty of that logo is that it can be used with virtually any design - it&#039;d even work with their current uniforms.

C&#039;mon, Nats - do the right thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Paul Lukas said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279178">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">chance said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279173">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">AJ said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279170"><p>
and the sleeve patch on this one is one of the best things i&#8217;ve ever seen:<br />
<a href="http://espn.go.com/i/magazine/new/uni_monuments.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://espn.go.com/i/magazine/new/uni_monuments.jpg' target="_blank">http://espn.go.com/i...</a>
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more &#8211; that&#8217;s amazing.  The Nationals should adopt that immediately.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That sleeve patch was my favorite thing about the entire Nats design contest.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And the beauty of that logo is that it can be used with virtually any design &#8211; it&#8217;d even work with their current uniforms.</p>
<p>C&#8217;mon, Nats &#8211; do the right thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Craven</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279251</link>
		<dc:creator>James Craven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279251</guid>
		<description>Mr. Randolph will have to get another number.  Brand will wear #42.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Randolph will have to get another number.  Brand will wear #42.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shadeymonk</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279250</link>
		<dc:creator>shadeymonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279250</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;279243&quot;]Why was Elton Brand introduced in today&#039;s press conference with a throwback? Is it because Shav Randolph wears #42 in the regular jersey? Or are the Sixers teasing us with these?[/quote]

I&#039;d like to know too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Forbesy said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279243"><p>
Why was Elton Brand introduced in today&#8217;s press conference with a throwback? Is it because Shav Randolph wears #42 in the regular jersey? Or are the Sixers teasing us with these?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;d like to know too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: svh</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279249</link>
		<dc:creator>svh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279249</guid>
		<description>i think you should not use all caps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think you should not use all caps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terrance wright</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279248</link>
		<dc:creator>terrance wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 05:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279248</guid>
		<description>I THINK THE NEW TEAM IN OKLAHOMA CITY SHOULD BE CALLED THE OKLAHOMA CITY HONEY OR BLACK BEES, WITH THE BLACK YELLOW AND WHITE UNIFORM COLOR SCHEME. LET ME KNOW WHAT U THINK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I THINK THE NEW TEAM IN OKLAHOMA CITY SHOULD BE CALLED THE OKLAHOMA CITY HONEY OR BLACK BEES, WITH THE BLACK YELLOW AND WHITE UNIFORM COLOR SCHEME. LET ME KNOW WHAT U THINK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279247</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 05:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279247</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;279245&quot;][quote comment=&quot;279244&quot;]New Bolton home kit.  Looks like crap.  Reebok get rid of their logos?

http://www.bwfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/General/0,,1004~1340338,00.html[/quote]

So is Reebok the sponsor as well as the uni designer, or is the logo just totally out of control?  And what\&#039;s up with the club logo?  It looks like sperm going at an egg:
http://www.bwfc.premiumtv.co.uk/namedImage/1004/cubaLayoutHeaderIMG.jpg[/quote]


Reebok is the jersey Sponsor.  Bolton plays at the Reebok stadium, and Reebok was founded in Bolton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">LarenR said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279245">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">Steven said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279244"><p>
New Bolton home kit.  Looks like crap.  Reebok get rid of their logos?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bwfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/General/0,,1004~1340338,00.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.bwfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/General/0,,1004~1340338,00.html' target="_blank">http://www.bwfc.prem...</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>So is Reebok the sponsor as well as the uni designer, or is the logo just totally out of control?  And what\&#8217;s up with the club logo?  It looks like sperm going at an egg:<br />
<a href="http://www.bwfc.premiumtv.co.uk/namedImage/1004/cubaLayoutHeaderIMG.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.bwfc.premiumtv.co.uk/namedImage/1004/cubaLayoutHeaderIMG.jpg' target="_blank">http://www.bwfc.prem...</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Reebok is the jersey Sponsor.  Bolton plays at the Reebok stadium, and Reebok was founded in Bolton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: u2-horn</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279246</link>
		<dc:creator>u2-horn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 04:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279246</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;279157&quot;][quote comment=&quot;279155&quot;][quote comment=&quot;279140&quot;]after all, nike&#039;s have a DIFFERENT NUMBER of vents...did kellog patent a 4 vent, a 5 vent or a 6 vent cap???  well, nike&#039;s is different[/quote]

No, they both have 4 vents.[/quote]

well i was just going by what is in the article, which states:

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Kellogg design has a button on top, and Nike&#039;s does not; Kellogg&#039;s cap has five panels, whereas Nike&#039;s has six; and the stitching was different.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;[/quote]


A vent is not a panel :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">LI Phil said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279157">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">u2-horn said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279155">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">LI Phil said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2008/07/09/hmmm-did-joseph-cooper-wear-a-mask/#comment-279140"><p>
after all, nike&#8217;s have a DIFFERENT NUMBER of vents&#8230;did kellog patent a 4 vent, a 5 vent or a 6 vent cap???  well, nike&#8217;s is different</p>
</blockquote>
<p>No, they both have 4 vents.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>well i was just going by what is in the article, which states:</p>
<p><strong><em>The Kellogg design has a button on top, and Nike&#8217;s does not; Kellogg&#8217;s cap has five panels, whereas Nike&#8217;s has six; and the stitching was different.</em></strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p>A vent is not a panel :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
