<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: London Bridge(stone) Is Falling Down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/10/24/london-bridgestone-is-falling-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/10/24/london-bridgestone-is-falling-down/</link>
	<description>The Obsessive Study Of Athletics Aesthetics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:25:38 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/10/24/london-bridgestone-is-falling-down/#comment-160822</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=695#comment-160822</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;160552&quot;]Looking at those old Vikings cards- am I the only one who found it annoying that the helmet logos were airbrushed out of the cards back in the 70&#039;s and early 80&#039;s?

Does anyone know the exact story as to why they had to be removed? Licensing perhaps??[/quote]

Noticed that and it bugs me, too.  I&#039;ll check and see if I can find out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Timothy B said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/10/24/london-bridgestone-is-falling-down/#comment-160552"><p>
Looking at those old Vikings cards- am I the only one who found it annoying that the helmet logos were airbrushed out of the cards back in the 70&#8217;s and early 80&#8217;s?</p>
<p>Does anyone know the exact story as to why they had to be removed? Licensing perhaps??</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Noticed that and it bugs me, too.  I&#8217;ll check and see if I can find out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/10/24/london-bridgestone-is-falling-down/#comment-160623</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 07:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=695#comment-160623</guid>
		<description>http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/bill_trocchi/10/24/conference.rankings/2.html

I&#039;m an idiot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/bill_trocchi/10/24/conference.rankings/2.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/bill_trocchi/10/24/conference.rankings/2.html' target="_blank">http://sportsillustr...</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m an idiot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/10/24/london-bridgestone-is-falling-down/#comment-160622</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 07:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=695#comment-160622</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/bill_trocchi/10/24/conference.rankings/2.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Sorry...link issues</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/bill_trocchi/10/24/conference.rankings/2.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a></p>
<p>Sorry&#8230;link issues</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/10/24/london-bridgestone-is-falling-down/#comment-160620</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 07:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=695#comment-160620</guid>
		<description>Check out what whoever this goober is at SI had to say.  Look at his answer to the &quot;angry email of the week&quot; regarding Oregon&#039;s all whites (bottom of the page).

&lt;a href=&quot;http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/bill_trocchi/10/24/conference.rankings/2.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out what whoever this goober is at SI had to say.  Look at his answer to the &#8220;angry email of the week&#8221; regarding Oregon&#8217;s all whites (bottom of the page).</p>
<p><a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/bill_trocchi/10/24/conference.rankings/2.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: furrymunster</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/10/24/london-bridgestone-is-falling-down/#comment-160596</link>
		<dc:creator>furrymunster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 05:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=695#comment-160596</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;160507&quot;]No more beer commentary here, OK? Thanks.[/quote]
Why? Morality watch is at it again! You do not like purple, you do not like Nike, but we are subjected to reading your rants about it. People want to goof about a stupid ad and talk about beer and you expect everyone to follow your lead and talk about socks with stripes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Paul Lukas said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/10/24/london-bridgestone-is-falling-down/#comment-160507"><p>
No more beer commentary here, OK? Thanks.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Why? Morality watch is at it again! You do not like purple, you do not like Nike, but we are subjected to reading your rants about it. People want to goof about a stupid ad and talk about beer and you expect everyone to follow your lead and talk about socks with stripes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/10/24/london-bridgestone-is-falling-down/#comment-160594</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 05:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=695#comment-160594</guid>
		<description>What do you all think the Chargers inevitable &quot;Wildfires&quot; remembrance patch will look like?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you all think the Chargers inevitable &#8220;Wildfires&#8221; remembrance patch will look like?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: furrymunster</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/10/24/london-bridgestone-is-falling-down/#comment-160593</link>
		<dc:creator>furrymunster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 05:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=695#comment-160593</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;160354&quot;][quote comment=&quot;160343&quot;][quote comment=&quot;160272&quot;]&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.panthers.com/Common/Article.aspx?id=26294&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&#039;s an entire bridal party in jerseys&lt;/a&gt;, getting married while tailgating.[/quote]

Now see that at least is tactful.

The other thing a formal vest like that...Dude, your wife actually allowed something like that?  That is the marrying type (as they say in the south) I think it is original, though maybe a little silly for a formal occasion....JMHO[/quote]

god that reminded me of an email i got months ago.
guys took jerseys and incorporated them into their tuxedos and their dates did similarly with their dresses.  it was ridiculous.
http://www.kbpc.net/ghetto/prom7%5B1%5D.jpg
http://www.kbpc.net/ghetto/prom7b[1].jpg
http://www.kbpc.net/ghetto/prom11[1].jpg
http://www.kbpc.net/ghetto/prom10.jpg[/quote]

Are you sure that wasn&#039;t a pimp and whore party?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">todd krevanchi said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/10/24/london-bridgestone-is-falling-down/#comment-160354">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">Ben Dover said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/10/24/london-bridgestone-is-falling-down/#comment-160343">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">dm00n said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/10/24/london-bridgestone-is-falling-down/#comment-160272"><p>
<a href="http://www.panthers.com/Common/Article.aspx?id=26294" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Here&#8217;s an entire bridal party in jerseys</a>, getting married while tailgating.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Now see that at least is tactful.</p>
<p>The other thing a formal vest like that&#8230;Dude, your wife actually allowed something like that?  That is the marrying type (as they say in the south) I think it is original, though maybe a little silly for a formal occasion&#8230;.JMHO</p>
</blockquote>
<p>god that reminded me of an email i got months ago.<br />
guys took jerseys and incorporated them into their tuxedos and their dates did similarly with their dresses.  it was ridiculous.<br />
<a href="http://www.kbpc.net/ghetto/prom7%5B1%5D.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.kbpc.net/ghetto/prom7%5B1%5D.jpg' target="_blank">http://www.kbpc.net/...</a><br />
<a href="http://www.kbpc.net/ghetto/prom7b1.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.kbpc.net/ghetto/prom7b1.jpg' target="_blank">http://www.kbpc.net/...</a><br />
<a href="http://www.kbpc.net/ghetto/prom111.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.kbpc.net/ghetto/prom111.jpg' target="_blank">http://www.kbpc.net/...</a><br />
<a href="http://www.kbpc.net/ghetto/prom10.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.kbpc.net/ghetto/prom10.jpg' target="_blank">http://www.kbpc.net/...</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Are you sure that wasn&#8217;t a pimp and whore party?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Engle</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/10/24/london-bridgestone-is-falling-down/#comment-160588</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Engle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=695#comment-160588</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;160584&quot;]Would these Rockies uniforms tonight win the &quot;Ugliest World Series Uniform, Ever&quot; award? I would say it&#039;s a tie between these and the Marlins black jerseys from 2003 but I think that hideous patch puts the Rockies over the top. Quite a contrast between those and the classic Red Sox home jerseys. If the Rockies thought those vests were good luck this postseason then perhaps this blowout tonight will be the last we&#039;ll see of these.[/quote]
I&#039;m not a fan of the Houston Astros&#039; current home jerseys.  Very busy.  Pinstripes, triple outlines, a hard to read red front number, and the seemingly obligatory Texas-related sleeve patch.  Somebody needs to learn that at times, less is more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Jason DeDonato said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/10/24/london-bridgestone-is-falling-down/#comment-160584"><p>
Would these Rockies uniforms tonight win the &#8220;Ugliest World Series Uniform, Ever&#8221; award? I would say it&#8217;s a tie between these and the Marlins black jerseys from 2003 but I think that hideous patch puts the Rockies over the top. Quite a contrast between those and the classic Red Sox home jerseys. If the Rockies thought those vests were good luck this postseason then perhaps this blowout tonight will be the last we&#8217;ll see of these.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not a fan of the Houston Astros&#8217; current home jerseys.  Very busy.  Pinstripes, triple outlines, a hard to read red front number, and the seemingly obligatory Texas-related sleeve patch.  Somebody needs to learn that at times, less is more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason DeDonato</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/10/24/london-bridgestone-is-falling-down/#comment-160584</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason DeDonato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=695#comment-160584</guid>
		<description>Would these Rockies uniforms tonight win the &quot;Ugliest World Series Uniform, Ever&quot; award? I would say it&#039;s a tie between these and the Marlins black jerseys from 2003 but I think that hideous patch puts the Rockies over the top. Quite a contrast between those and the classic Red Sox home jerseys. If the Rockies thought those vests were good luck this postseason then perhaps this blowout tonight will be the last we&#039;ll see of these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would these Rockies uniforms tonight win the &#8220;Ugliest World Series Uniform, Ever&#8221; award? I would say it&#8217;s a tie between these and the Marlins black jerseys from 2003 but I think that hideous patch puts the Rockies over the top. Quite a contrast between those and the classic Red Sox home jerseys. If the Rockies thought those vests were good luck this postseason then perhaps this blowout tonight will be the last we&#8217;ll see of these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TD</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/10/24/london-bridgestone-is-falling-down/#comment-160582</link>
		<dc:creator>TD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=695#comment-160582</guid>
		<description>Upside:   good odds on standard road grays tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upside:   good odds on standard road grays tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
