<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saturday Open Thread</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/06/23/saturday-open-thread-40/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/06/23/saturday-open-thread-40/</link>
	<description>The Obsessive Study Of Athletics Aesthetics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:25:38 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Craven</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/06/23/saturday-open-thread-40/#comment-108020</link>
		<dc:creator>James Craven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 23:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=530#comment-108020</guid>
		<description>My rankings of the new NHL jerseysso far?

1. Boston Bruins.  Wins most improved.  Should have gone gold/black/white/black/gold on white jerseys though.
2. Columbus. Nice upgrade.
3. Los Angeles. Meh.  More purple.
4. Carolina. Nice.
5. NY Islanders. Someone stop Charles Wang before he ruins the unis again!
6. Washington Crapitals. Bites, blows, stinks and sucks at once.  Major downgrade with logo, colors.  Should have kept Cobalt Blue, bronze or gone to gold and used &quot;Eagle W&quot; with red trim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My rankings of the new NHL jerseysso far?</p>
<p>1. Boston Bruins.  Wins most improved.  Should have gone gold/black/white/black/gold on white jerseys though.<br />
2. Columbus. Nice upgrade.<br />
3. Los Angeles. Meh.  More purple.<br />
4. Carolina. Nice.<br />
5. NY Islanders. Someone stop Charles Wang before he ruins the unis again!<br />
6. Washington Crapitals. Bites, blows, stinks and sucks at once.  Major downgrade with logo, colors.  Should have kept Cobalt Blue, bronze or gone to gold and used &#8220;Eagle W&#8221; with red trim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Craven</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/06/23/saturday-open-thread-40/#comment-108019</link>
		<dc:creator>James Craven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 23:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=530#comment-108019</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;107397&quot;]&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&quot;Here&#039;s my take on the Hawks unis:

&quot;They should have kept the yellow...even if they used it as a minor color with the red &amp; blue. &quot;They had established an identity in red &amp; yellow.
&quot;These unis aren&#039;t bad...they are a little bland. &quot;Although I like this current trend of more plain, traditional unis instead of the 90&#039;s trend with massive logos, teams are starting to look the same.
&quot;These unis sort of look like the Nike college template sans shoulder stripes.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;[/quote]

Problem is, no matter what color they wear...

a. The team still can&#039;t draw flies even if they covered themselves in dung, and
b. they still suck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Josh said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/06/23/saturday-open-thread-40/#comment-107397"><p>
<strong><em>&#8220;Here&#8217;s my take on the Hawks unis:</em></strong></p>
<p>&#8220;They should have kept the yellow&#8230;even if they used it as a minor color with the red &amp; blue. &#8220;They had established an identity in red &amp; yellow.<br />
&#8220;These unis aren&#8217;t bad&#8230;they are a little bland. &#8220;Although I like this current trend of more plain, traditional unis instead of the 90&#8217;s trend with massive logos, teams are starting to look the same.<br />
&#8220;These unis sort of look like the Nike college template sans shoulder stripes.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Problem is, no matter what color they wear&#8230;</p>
<p>a. The team still can&#8217;t draw flies even if they covered themselves in dung, and<br />
b. they still suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/06/23/saturday-open-thread-40/#comment-107758</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 14:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=530#comment-107758</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;107402&quot;]&lt;i&gt;I have never seen the Sox wear throwbacks from the 1975 era and have never reintroduced the caps which is a shame because they are great.&lt;/i&gt;

During the &#039;96 season (I may be off a year), the Sox wore three different home caps: the regular blue, a white cap with a blue bill and red &#039;B&#039;, and the late &#039;70s era red. Always blue on the road. As I recall, they wore the white caps most often at home, and only wore the reds on Sundays and holidays. Additionally, I seem to recall them wearing the red caps once or twice in throwback games.

&lt;i&gt;I really hate when the catchers masks (hockey style) dont match on a retro night, its quite annoying.&lt;/i&gt;

Barrett used to wear the hockey style mask, then switched for the &#039;06 season to the old style catcher mask. He was only arrived in San Diego on Thursday. My guess he just hasn&#039;t found or been given a proper mask yet.[/quote]

Barrett was wearing the old mask this year until the Zambrano fight, when he got his lip cut up he went hockey style to keep pressure off the lip, once its fully healed he&#039;ll probably go back to the old style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Jason said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/06/23/saturday-open-thread-40/#comment-107402"><p>
<i>I have never seen the Sox wear throwbacks from the 1975 era and have never reintroduced the caps which is a shame because they are great.</i></p>
<p>During the &#8216;96 season (I may be off a year), the Sox wore three different home caps: the regular blue, a white cap with a blue bill and red &#8216;B&#8217;, and the late &#8217;70s era red. Always blue on the road. As I recall, they wore the white caps most often at home, and only wore the reds on Sundays and holidays. Additionally, I seem to recall them wearing the red caps once or twice in throwback games.</p>
<p><i>I really hate when the catchers masks (hockey style) dont match on a retro night, its quite annoying.</i></p>
<p>Barrett used to wear the hockey style mask, then switched for the &#8216;06 season to the old style catcher mask. He was only arrived in San Diego on Thursday. My guess he just hasn&#8217;t found or been given a proper mask yet.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Barrett was wearing the old mask this year until the Zambrano fight, when he got his lip cut up he went hockey style to keep pressure off the lip, once its fully healed he&#8217;ll probably go back to the old style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/06/23/saturday-open-thread-40/#comment-107744</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 14:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=530#comment-107744</guid>
		<description>Glad I wasn&#039;t the only one who thought &#039;USC&#039; means University of Southern California NOT University of South Carolina!?! I honestly have no west coast  bias (I live in Brooklyn) but I am guessing that the only people who call South Carolina &#039;USC&#039; are alumni.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad I wasn&#8217;t the only one who thought &#8216;USC&#8217; means University of Southern California NOT University of South Carolina!?! I honestly have no west coast  bias (I live in Brooklyn) but I am guessing that the only people who call South Carolina &#8216;USC&#8217; are alumni.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/06/23/saturday-open-thread-40/#comment-107740</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 14:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=530#comment-107740</guid>
		<description>Even though I always associate the Hawks unis as being predominately red (late 70&#039;s) and later red and yellow (early 80&#039;s and beyond). I have to revaluate after looking through some old basketball cards / photos. It seems like Atlanta has used most of the rainbow in their unis. Consider the Lou Hudson era, baby blue with red and royal blue trim (late 60&#039;s) and the Pete Maravich era lime green and royal blue (early 70&#039;s). My point is change is nothing new for the Hawks. As a matter of fact they began as the Milwaukee Hawks (any idea what those uni colors were ?) who became the St. Louis Hawks (ditto as above ?)and finally the Atlanta Hawks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though I always associate the Hawks unis as being predominately red (late 70&#8217;s) and later red and yellow (early 80&#8217;s and beyond). I have to revaluate after looking through some old basketball cards / photos. It seems like Atlanta has used most of the rainbow in their unis. Consider the Lou Hudson era, baby blue with red and royal blue trim (late 60&#8217;s) and the Pete Maravich era lime green and royal blue (early 70&#8217;s). My point is change is nothing new for the Hawks. As a matter of fact they began as the Milwaukee Hawks (any idea what those uni colors were ?) who became the St. Louis Hawks (ditto as above ?)and finally the Atlanta Hawks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/06/23/saturday-open-thread-40/#comment-107730</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 13:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=530#comment-107730</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;107299&quot;]New ATL Hawks unis

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nba.com/media/hawks/white_jersey_photogallery_6.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Home&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nba.com/media/hawks/blue_jersey_photogallery_13.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ROAD&lt;/a&gt;[/quote]

Yuck.

if they went back to &lt;a href=&quot;http://a1259.g.akamai.net/f/1259/5586/5d/images.art.com/images/-/Dominique-Wilkins---Photofile--C10103603.jpeg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this for their jerseys&lt;/a&gt; that would be better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Josh said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/06/23/saturday-open-thread-40/#comment-107299"><p>
New ATL Hawks unis</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nba.com/media/hawks/white_jersey_photogallery_6.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Home</a><br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/media/hawks/blue_jersey_photogallery_13.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">ROAD</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yuck.</p>
<p>if they went back to <a href="http://a1259.g.akamai.net/f/1259/5586/5d/images.art.com/images/-/Dominique-Wilkins---Photofile--C10103603.jpeg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">this for their jerseys</a> that would be better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clevo</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/06/23/saturday-open-thread-40/#comment-107669</link>
		<dc:creator>Clevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 09:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=530#comment-107669</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;107498&quot;]&lt;i&gt;And when did the Sox wear a white hat???&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

During the 1997 season. The SoSH says wiki says:

&lt;blockquote&gt;For a few games in 1997, the Sox showcased two alternate caps... One was white with a red &quot;B&quot; and a blue bill. This one was worn perhaps only once. The other was a red cap with a red bill, very similar to the caps worn in by the 1975 team, with the lone difference being the &quot;B&quot;, which was white in the 1997 version. This red cap was worn more often than the white cap.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m sure this is incorrect. They wore the white hat more often than not that season (home games only) and hardly ever wore the reds. The detail about the white &#039;B&#039; may be right, though.[/quote]

Wasn&#039;t the white hat their Sunday hat? All I remember is them being referred to as the good humor men on sports center whenever they wore them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Jason said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/06/23/saturday-open-thread-40/#comment-107498"><p>
<i>And when did the Sox wear a white hat???</i></p>
<p>During the 1997 season. The SoSH says wiki says:</p>
<p class="quoter_comment_header">Clevo said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/06/23/saturday-open-thread-40/#comment-"><p>For a few games in 1997, the Sox showcased two alternate caps&#8230; One was white with a red &#8220;B&#8221; and a blue bill. This one was worn perhaps only once. The other was a red cap with a red bill, very similar to the caps worn in by the 1975 team, with the lone difference being the &#8220;B&#8221;, which was white in the 1997 version. This red cap was worn more often than the white cap.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m sure this is incorrect. They wore the white hat more often than not that season (home games only) and hardly ever wore the reds. The detail about the white &#8216;B&#8217; may be right, though.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t the white hat their Sunday hat? All I remember is them being referred to as the good humor men on sports center whenever they wore them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teebz</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/06/23/saturday-open-thread-40/#comment-107657</link>
		<dc:creator>Teebz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 08:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=530#comment-107657</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve posted a quick analysis of the new NHL jerseys that have been shown so far from across the league. Check it out &lt;a href=&quot;http://hockey-blog-in-canada.blogspot.com/2007/06/more-new-jerseys.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. My rankings so far?

1. Boston
2. Washington
3. Columbus
4. NY Islanders/Long Island Broncos
5. Los Angeles Kings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve posted a quick analysis of the new NHL jerseys that have been shown so far from across the league. Check it out <a href="http://hockey-blog-in-canada.blogspot.com/2007/06/more-new-jerseys.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">here</a>. My rankings so far?</p>
<p>1. Boston<br />
2. Washington<br />
3. Columbus<br />
4. NY Islanders/Long Island Broncos<br />
5. Los Angeles Kings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark in Shiga</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/06/23/saturday-open-thread-40/#comment-107653</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark in Shiga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 08:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=530#comment-107653</guid>
		<description>I really like those raised portions inside the numbers on the Hawks&#039; jerseys.  They make the numbers look engraved, and in a much better style than what the Rockets used to do.

But what&#039;s the deal with the silly team logo on the back collar?  Lots of teams are doing that and it just looks silly.  It also pushes the names and numbers down, making them harder to see.

Ditch the mini-logos!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like those raised portions inside the numbers on the Hawks&#8217; jerseys.  They make the numbers look engraved, and in a much better style than what the Rockets used to do.</p>
<p>But what&#8217;s the deal with the silly team logo on the back collar?  Lots of teams are doing that and it just looks silly.  It also pushes the names and numbers down, making them harder to see.</p>
<p>Ditch the mini-logos!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wall of Beef</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/06/23/saturday-open-thread-40/#comment-107593</link>
		<dc:creator>Wall of Beef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 06:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=530#comment-107593</guid>
		<description>ATL Hawks Jerseys: They arn&#039;t ugly, but whats exciting about that jersey? Is Navy Blue the only Blue allowed anymore? Honestly. The secondary logo is a bunk too, and about as generic as it gets these days. The whole thing feels like it was created with the &quot;Safe Jersey Logo Generator&quot; Snore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ATL Hawks Jerseys: They arn&#8217;t ugly, but whats exciting about that jersey? Is Navy Blue the only Blue allowed anymore? Honestly. The secondary logo is a bunk too, and about as generic as it gets these days. The whole thing feels like it was created with the &#8220;Safe Jersey Logo Generator&#8221; Snore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
