<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Departed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/05/01/the-departed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/05/01/the-departed/</link>
	<description>The Obsessive Study Of Athletics Aesthetics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:48:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4122</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: spanky</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/05/01/the-departed/#comment-79769</link>
		<dc:creator>spanky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 13:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=466#comment-79769</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/afp/20070501/capt.sge.uan67.010507053530.photo00.photo.default-512x359.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;32&quot; patch&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/afp/20070501/capt.sge.uan67.010507053530.photo00.photo.default-512x359.jpg" rel="nofollow">&#8220;32&#8243; patch</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tessa</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/05/01/the-departed/#comment-79552</link>
		<dc:creator>tessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 05:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=466#comment-79552</guid>
		<description>This is all beginning to sound a little too much like math.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all beginning to sound a little too much like math.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minna H.</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/05/01/the-departed/#comment-79549</link>
		<dc:creator>Minna H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 05:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=466#comment-79549</guid>
		<description>Hm.  By my own logic, Hughes should be credited with 6 2/3 innings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm.  By my own logic, Hughes should be credited with 6 2/3 innings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minna H.</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/05/01/the-departed/#comment-79548</link>
		<dc:creator>Minna H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 05:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=466#comment-79548</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;79544&quot;][quote comment=&quot;79542&quot;]And &lt;strong&gt;Zach&lt;/strong&gt;!  C&#039;mon, &lt;strong&gt;Zach&lt;/strong&gt;, don&#039;t be so nitpicky.  What do you think this is?  An obsession for details board?[/quote]

Sorry pal.

I get the same way when people refer to hockey as having 3 quarters instead of periods.[/quote]

You know I&#039;m just messing with you, right?

There are actually people who say hockey has three quarters?  That doesn&#039;t even make logical sense.

&lt;strong&gt;tessa&lt;/strong&gt;, it does seem like Hughes should get credit for the next two pitches since he would be on the hook for any runner on base.  6 1/2 innings sounds about right to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="79544"][quote comment="79542"]And <strong>Zach</strong>!  C&#8217;mon, <strong>Zach</strong>, don&#8217;t be so nitpicky.  What do you think this is?  An obsession for details board?[/quote]</p>
<p>Sorry pal.</p>
<p>I get the same way when people refer to hockey as having 3 quarters instead of periods.[/quote]</p>
<p>You know I&#8217;m just messing with you, right?</p>
<p>There are actually people who say hockey has three quarters?  That doesn&#8217;t even make logical sense.</p>
<p><strong>tessa</strong>, it does seem like Hughes should get credit for the next two pitches since he would be on the hook for any runner on base.  6 1/2 innings sounds about right to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tessa</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/05/01/the-departed/#comment-79545</link>
		<dc:creator>tessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 04:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=466#comment-79545</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;79538&quot;]

Slight correction - 6 1/3 innings[/quote]

Sorry.  Clearly my typo-prone left ring finger felt that Hughes should have gotten credit for first few pitches to Teixeira.  Or something like that.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="79538"]</p>
<p>Slight correction &#8211; 6 1/3 innings[/quote]</p>
<p>Sorry.  Clearly my typo-prone left ring finger felt that Hughes should have gotten credit for first few pitches to Teixeira.  Or something like that.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zack</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/05/01/the-departed/#comment-79544</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 04:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=466#comment-79544</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;79542&quot;]And &lt;strong&gt;Zach&lt;/strong&gt;!  C&#039;mon, &lt;strong&gt;Zach&lt;/strong&gt;, don&#039;t be so nitpicky.  What do you think this is?  An obsession for details board?[/quote]

Sorry pal.   I get the same way when people refer to hockey as having 3 quarters instead of periods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="79542"]And <strong>Zach</strong>!  C&#8217;mon, <strong>Zach</strong>, don&#8217;t be so nitpicky.  What do you think this is?  An obsession for details board?[/quote]</p>
<p>Sorry pal.   I get the same way when people refer to hockey as having 3 quarters instead of periods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minna H.</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/05/01/the-departed/#comment-79542</link>
		<dc:creator>Minna H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 04:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=466#comment-79542</guid>
		<description>And &lt;strong&gt;Zach&lt;/strong&gt;!  C&#039;mon, &lt;strong&gt;Zach&lt;/strong&gt;, don&#039;t be so nitpicky.  What do you think this is?  An obsession for details board?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And <strong>Zach</strong>!  C&#8217;mon, <strong>Zach</strong>, don&#8217;t be so nitpicky.  What do you think this is?  An obsession for details board?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minna H.</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/05/01/the-departed/#comment-79541</link>
		<dc:creator>Minna H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 04:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=466#comment-79541</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;79537&quot;]Man, one can&#039;t navigate away from the page for a minute without being rendered redundant by the quick responses of this well-educated blog community (I jest, I jest...).  :P[/quote]

I know!  I had to chastise &lt;strong&gt;Teebz&lt;/strong&gt; earlier for this very thing.  At least at this time, it&#039;s just you, me, and &lt;strong&gt;Joey Guns&lt;/strong&gt;.  Maybe &lt;strong&gt;Frankie&lt;/strong&gt; is still here.

Of course, I could have held off on asking before I looked it up, but where is the fun in that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="79537"]Man, one can&#8217;t navigate away from the page for a minute without being rendered redundant by the quick responses of this well-educated blog community (I jest, I jest&#8230;).  :P[/quote]</p>
<p>I know!  I had to chastise <strong>Teebz</strong> earlier for this very thing.  At least at this time, it&#8217;s just you, me, and <strong>Joey Guns</strong>.  Maybe <strong>Frankie</strong> is still here.</p>
<p>Of course, I could have held off on asking before I looked it up, but where is the fun in that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zack</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/05/01/the-departed/#comment-79538</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 04:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=466#comment-79538</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;79536&quot;]&lt;strong&gt;Minna&lt;/strong&gt;:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/recap?gameId=270501113&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
Phil Hughes&lt;/a&gt; is the casualty.

A little background:  We Yankees fans have been waiting for him to come up for a long time because he has been developing in the minors.  Because of the (many, many, many) other injuries to the starting rotation, he was brought up a little earlier than expected.  There was much rejoicing.  Then he stunk a little in his first outing.  Tonight, he looked amazing.  Amazing.  He had a no-hitter through 6 1/2 innings and had to leave with a &quot;significant&quot; hamstring injury that will likely have him out for at least two months (if they bring him back to the majors at all this year).

Hughes has previously gone high-socked, but chose complete pajama pants for this game.  Maybe he should have stuck with the high socks.  :([/quote]

Slight correction - 6 1/3 innings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="79536"]<strong>Minna</strong>:<br />
<a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/recap?gameId=270501113" rel="nofollow"><br />
Phil Hughes</a> is the casualty.</p>
<p>A little background:  We Yankees fans have been waiting for him to come up for a long time because he has been developing in the minors.  Because of the (many, many, many) other injuries to the starting rotation, he was brought up a little earlier than expected.  There was much rejoicing.  Then he stunk a little in his first outing.  Tonight, he looked amazing.  Amazing.  He had a no-hitter through 6 1/2 innings and had to leave with a &#8220;significant&#8221; hamstring injury that will likely have him out for at least two months (if they bring him back to the majors at all this year).</p>
<p>Hughes has previously gone high-socked, but chose complete pajama pants for this game.  Maybe he should have stuck with the high socks.  :([/quote]</p>
<p>Slight correction &#8211; 6 1/3 innings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tessa</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2007/05/01/the-departed/#comment-79537</link>
		<dc:creator>tessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 04:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/?p=466#comment-79537</guid>
		<description>Man, one can&#039;t navigate away from the page for a minute without being rendered redundant by the quick responses of this well-educated blog community (I jest, I jest...).  :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, one can&#8217;t navigate away from the page for a minute without being rendered redundant by the quick responses of this well-educated blog community (I jest, I jest&#8230;).  :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
