<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;T,&#8217; as in Travesty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/11/29/t-as-in-travesty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/11/29/t-as-in-travesty/</link>
	<description>The Obsessive Study Of Athletics Aesthetics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:53:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ACC (the Brain)</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/11/29/t-as-in-travesty/#comment-25708</link>
		<dc:creator>ACC (the Brain)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 16:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/11/29/t-as-in-travesty/#comment-25708</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;25678&quot;]That SI.com list of the best uni is ridiculous. They have the KS Chief? But they dont have the St. Louis Cards or the New York Rangers. What gives?[/quote]

I think the list is fairly lame. 

It&#039;s almost all unis that haven&#039;t changed in decades. Most of them are nice but the list should be renamed to suggest longevity or stability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">bryan said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/11/29/t-as-in-travesty/#comment-25678"><p>
That SI.com list of the best uni is ridiculous. They have the KS Chief? But they dont have the St. Louis Cards or the New York Rangers. What gives?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think the list is fairly lame. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s almost all unis that haven&#8217;t changed in decades. Most of them are nice but the list should be renamed to suggest longevity or stability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerry</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/11/29/t-as-in-travesty/#comment-25689</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/11/29/t-as-in-travesty/#comment-25689</guid>
		<description>OK, let&#039;s try that again....the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.e-nba.pl/jazz/stroje/new_orleans_jazz.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OLD JAZZ LOGO&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, let&#8217;s try that again&#8230;.the <a href="http://www.e-nba.pl/jazz/stroje/new_orleans_jazz.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">OLD JAZZ LOGO</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerry</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/11/29/t-as-in-travesty/#comment-25683</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/11/29/t-as-in-travesty/#comment-25683</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;25585&quot;]The Sharks will always be teal.
The &lt;strong&gt;Hornets &lt;/strong&gt;will always be teal
The Jaguars will always be teal.
The Marlins will always be teal.

The Pistons should not go back to teal since it&#039;s not an original color.

That&#039;s one team per sport that can easily be identified with the color. Note that all teams entered their respective leagues after 1987. I think all those teams are respectable franchises and should not change color schemes just to be trendy.[/quote]
Personally, I think the Hornets need to ditch the teal for GREEN since they&#039;ve added the YELLOW to the color scheme in an obvious attempt to relate closer to the old &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sportslogos.net/images/teams/thumbs/255.gif&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;JAZZ&lt;/a&gt; logo and New Orleans&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cajunmarket.com/Carn-Mart/Carn-Mart-Beads/CM-1189.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mardi Gras&lt;/a&gt; heritage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">ACC (the Brain) said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/11/29/t-as-in-travesty/#comment-25585"><p>
The Sharks will always be teal.<br />
The <strong>Hornets </strong>will always be teal<br />
The Jaguars will always be teal.<br />
The Marlins will always be teal.</p>
<p>The Pistons should not go back to teal since it&#8217;s not an original color.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s one team per sport that can easily be identified with the color. Note that all teams entered their respective leagues after 1987. I think all those teams are respectable franchises and should not change color schemes just to be trendy.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Personally, I think the Hornets need to ditch the teal for GREEN since they&#8217;ve added the YELLOW to the color scheme in an obvious attempt to relate closer to the old <a href="http://www.sportslogos.net/images/teams/thumbs/255.gif" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">JAZZ</a> logo and New Orleans&#8217;s <a href="http://www.cajunmarket.com/Carn-Mart/Carn-Mart-Beads/CM-1189.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Mardi Gras</a> heritage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/11/29/t-as-in-travesty/#comment-25678</link>
		<dc:creator>bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/11/29/t-as-in-travesty/#comment-25678</guid>
		<description>That SI.com list of the best uni is ridiculous. They have the KS Chief? But they dont have the St. Louis Cards or the New York Rangers. What gives?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That SI.com list of the best uni is ridiculous. They have the KS Chief? But they dont have the St. Louis Cards or the New York Rangers. What gives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt B</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/11/29/t-as-in-travesty/#comment-25663</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 12:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/11/29/t-as-in-travesty/#comment-25663</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I missed the game, but are you sure you werenâ€™t looking at the dance team?&lt;/em&gt;
 
Six of one, half dozen of the other. But yes, it probably was the dance team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I missed the game, but are you sure you werenâ€™t looking at the dance team?</em></p>
<p>Six of one, half dozen of the other. But yes, it probably was the dance team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark in Shiga</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/11/29/t-as-in-travesty/#comment-25662</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark in Shiga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 12:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/11/29/t-as-in-travesty/#comment-25662</guid>
		<description>Not too happy to see names on the Dodgers&#039; jerseys, but supposedly Vin Scully said he likes them, and I&#039;m willing to compromise for a great announcer like Vin.  Maybe the Dodgers could go the route that a lot of traditional teams (Cubs, Giants, Red Sox) have been going, with the names only on the road?

The Dodgers also took out that completely-meaningless white layer underneath the blue numbers on the home jerseys.  I never knew why they bothered putting that there... does anyone know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not too happy to see names on the Dodgers&#8217; jerseys, but supposedly Vin Scully said he likes them, and I&#8217;m willing to compromise for a great announcer like Vin.  Maybe the Dodgers could go the route that a lot of traditional teams (Cubs, Giants, Red Sox) have been going, with the names only on the road?</p>
<p>The Dodgers also took out that completely-meaningless white layer underneath the blue numbers on the home jerseys.  I never knew why they bothered putting that there&#8230; does anyone know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/11/29/t-as-in-travesty/#comment-25658</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 07:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/11/29/t-as-in-travesty/#comment-25658</guid>
		<description>Never mind it works.  Sorry.
As a die-hard Dodger fan, I think making the outline of the LA on the white jersey same as the front Dodgers script is an improvement.  

I also agree with removing the white outline underneath Los Angeles on the gray jersey, but as I said earlier I do not agree with a Los Angeles Jersey with a LA patch.

The Giants have a Giants jersey with a Giants patch and a San Francisco jersey with a SF patch.  This also bothers me, even though I hate the Giants.  I don&#039;t like the repetition.

I would rather have the arm blank than with an LA.  However, Frank McCourt has been branding the LA logo around Dodger Stadium, placing it on the field behind homeplate and on the gaps of the outfield wall and I presume that played into his decision.

However, I&#039;m still holding out for a blue jersey even though I know, I&#039;ll never get it.  I figure a team nicknamed the Blue Crew and whose slogan is Think Blue needs a blue jersey.  They wore them once during Think Blue Week, I think it was 6 years ago, and never wore them again.

Well, I&#039;m sure I&#039;ve had my two cents and then some on the Dodgers Jersey.  At least they didn&#039;t add black, lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never mind it works.  Sorry.<br />
As a die-hard Dodger fan, I think making the outline of the LA on the white jersey same as the front Dodgers script is an improvement.  </p>
<p>I also agree with removing the white outline underneath Los Angeles on the gray jersey, but as I said earlier I do not agree with a Los Angeles Jersey with a LA patch.</p>
<p>The Giants have a Giants jersey with a Giants patch and a San Francisco jersey with a SF patch.  This also bothers me, even though I hate the Giants.  I don&#8217;t like the repetition.</p>
<p>I would rather have the arm blank than with an LA.  However, Frank McCourt has been branding the LA logo around Dodger Stadium, placing it on the field behind homeplate and on the gaps of the outfield wall and I presume that played into his decision.</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m still holding out for a blue jersey even though I know, I&#8217;ll never get it.  I figure a team nicknamed the Blue Crew and whose slogan is Think Blue needs a blue jersey.  They wore them once during Think Blue Week, I think it was 6 years ago, and never wore them again.</p>
<p>Well, I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ve had my two cents and then some on the Dodgers Jersey.  At least they didn&#8217;t add black, lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/11/29/t-as-in-travesty/#comment-25657</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/11/29/t-as-in-travesty/#comment-25657</guid>
		<description>My apologies, I&#039;m having some problems with the link that I didn&#039;t have earlier this evening.  I&#039;ll repost tomorrow morning, if I figure it out.

http://shop.mlb.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2292850&amp;cp=1452355</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My apologies, I&#8217;m having some problems with the link that I didn&#8217;t have earlier this evening.  I&#8217;ll repost tomorrow morning, if I figure it out.</p>
<p><a href="http://shop.mlb.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2292850&amp;cp=1452355" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://shop.mlb.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2292850&amp;cp=1452355' target="_blank">http://shop.mlb.com/...</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/11/29/t-as-in-travesty/#comment-25656</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/11/29/t-as-in-travesty/#comment-25656</guid>
		<description>This is the inspiration for the Dodgers road jersey.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://shop.mlb.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2292850&amp;cp=1452355&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the inspiration for the Dodgers road jersey.</p>
<p><a href="http://shop.mlb.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2292850&amp;cp=1452355" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/11/29/t-as-in-travesty/#comment-25654</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/11/29/t-as-in-travesty/#comment-25654</guid>
		<description>The white Dodger Jersey now has a blue LA, the previous was blue outlined by gray and white.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The white Dodger Jersey now has a blue LA, the previous was blue outlined by gray and white.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
