<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Division Series Roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/</link>
	<description>The Obsessive Study Of Athletics Aesthetics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:38:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A.J. Zydzik</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-13166</link>
		<dc:creator>A.J. Zydzik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-13166</guid>
		<description>Sigh....I give up...here are the links, copy and paste into address bar...

http://www.dfb.de/newsimg/9851c.jpg and http://www.dfb.de/newsimg/9851b.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh&#8230;.I give up&#8230;here are the links, copy and paste into address bar&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dfb.de/newsimg/9851c.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.dfb.de/newsimg/9851c.jpg' target="_blank">http://www.dfb.de/ne...</a> and <a href="http://www.dfb.de/newsimg/9851b.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.dfb.de/newsimg/9851b.jpg' target="_blank">http://www.dfb.de/ne...</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.J. Zydzik</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-13165</link>
		<dc:creator>A.J. Zydzik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-13165</guid>
		<description>Dammit, I guess I am also an idiot who cant use html code...anyway, lets try again with the picture of the German mismatched sleeves...&lt;a href=&quot;http://mediadb.kicker.de/news/1000/1100/7000/spielbericht/565884/280x210_lVOr2dqCOx.jpeg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dammit, I guess I am also an idiot who cant use html code&#8230;anyway, lets try again with the picture of the German mismatched sleeves&#8230;<a href="http://mediadb.kicker.de/news/1000/1100/7000/spielbericht/565884/280x210_lVOr2dqCOx.jpeg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.J. Zydzik</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-13160</link>
		<dc:creator>A.J. Zydzik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-13160</guid>
		<description>Disheartened to see Germanys jerseys in the EC qualifiers today.  I actually own one of the short sleeve jerseys and I think it looks fine, but they were wearing long sleeve jerseys today since the game was in Bratislava, and it appears Adidas is taking a note from Nike&#039;s book...yikes  &lt;a href=&quot;http://mediadb.kicker.de/news/1000/1100/7000/spielbericht/565884/280x210_lVOr2dqCOx.jpeg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disheartened to see Germanys jerseys in the EC qualifiers today.  I actually own one of the short sleeve jerseys and I think it looks fine, but they were wearing long sleeve jerseys today since the game was in Bratislava, and it appears Adidas is taking a note from Nike&#8217;s book&#8230;yikes  <a href="http://mediadb.kicker.de/news/1000/1100/7000/spielbericht/565884/280x210_lVOr2dqCOx.jpeg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ACC</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-12912</link>
		<dc:creator>ACC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-12912</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;12870&quot;][quote comment=&quot;12866&quot;]I like the Seahawks&#039; uniforms!  They are distinct and instantly identifiable with just one team, for a few reasons:

1.  They basically invented a new color.  Not only have I never seen a football uniform that was that shade before, I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve seen &lt;em&gt;anything&lt;/em&gt; that was that shade before.  (And I like the color.)

2.  They are committed to the monochrome look.  It&#039;s annoying when teams keep mixing and matching their uniforms the way Oregon or many of the teams in the NFL do.  But the Seahawks have never done that (except when hot weather makes it better to wear the white pants).  I think they are the only NFL team that has made monochrome uniforms their normal look.  And because of that, they have a unique identity.  If they used the white pants, they&#039;d look too much like the Eagles.

3.  Their uniforms are not cluttered messes like the ones the Bengals and Bills wear.  (The Bills are a double offender because their new colors are a ripoff of the Texans.)  Simpler is better.

I&#039;ll be surprised if anyone agrees with me, but that&#039;s my honest opinion![/quote]

Agreed.  110%.[/quote]

Agreed with points 1,2,and 3 whole-heartedly. They are instantly identifiable like all NFL teams should be. 
Regarding their commitment to monochrome I see the white pants way too often. They should wear only blue pants home or away. Ditch the white pants Seattle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Riff said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-12870">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">NMK said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-12866"><p>
I like the Seahawks&#8217; uniforms!  They are distinct and instantly identifiable with just one team, for a few reasons:</p>
<p>1.  They basically invented a new color.  Not only have I never seen a football uniform that was that shade before, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve seen <em>anything</em> that was that shade before.  (And I like the color.)</p>
<p>2.  They are committed to the monochrome look.  It&#8217;s annoying when teams keep mixing and matching their uniforms the way Oregon or many of the teams in the NFL do.  But the Seahawks have never done that (except when hot weather makes it better to wear the white pants).  I think they are the only NFL team that has made monochrome uniforms their normal look.  And because of that, they have a unique identity.  If they used the white pants, they&#8217;d look too much like the Eagles.</p>
<p>3.  Their uniforms are not cluttered messes like the ones the Bengals and Bills wear.  (The Bills are a double offender because their new colors are a ripoff of the Texans.)  Simpler is better.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be surprised if anyone agrees with me, but that&#8217;s my honest opinion!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Agreed.  110%.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Agreed with points 1,2,and 3 whole-heartedly. They are instantly identifiable like all NFL teams should be.<br />
Regarding their commitment to monochrome I see the white pants way too often. They should wear only blue pants home or away. Ditch the white pants Seattle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-12873</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-12873</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;12832&quot;]I know most people don&#039;t care, but I think &lt;a href=&quot;http://espn-i.starwave.com/media/apphoto/a0a2ec41-5ac2-4d06-ad5b-9d623dde12e1.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Belliard&lt;/a&gt; is one of the worst dressed players in MLB.  Not only does he wear his pants like pajamas, but he wears them extra baggy as well as his jersey (as can be seen in the link).  On the field he also wears his cap a little crooked and off-center.  I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s because of the way he wears his hair of if his head is shaped funny, but it always annoys me when I see it.  OK, got that off my chest.  I feel much, much better now.  ;-)[/quote]

He learned from C.C. Sabathia, as can be seen &lt;a href=&quot;http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://i.a.cnn.net/si/2005/fantasy/08/04/mailbag/p1_sabathia.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2005/fantasy/08/04/mailbag/index.html&amp;h=400&amp;w=300&amp;sz=38&amp;hl=en&amp;start=7&amp;tbnid=UPOejak3z92rlM:&amp;tbnh=124&amp;tbnw=93&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dcc%2Bsabathia%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DN&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Jeff said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-12832"><p>
I know most people don&#8217;t care, but I think <a href="http://espn-i.starwave.com/media/apphoto/a0a2ec41-5ac2-4d06-ad5b-9d623dde12e1.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Belliard</a> is one of the worst dressed players in MLB.  Not only does he wear his pants like pajamas, but he wears them extra baggy as well as his jersey (as can be seen in the link).  On the field he also wears his cap a little crooked and off-center.  I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s because of the way he wears his hair of if his head is shaped funny, but it always annoys me when I see it.  OK, got that off my chest.  I feel much, much better now.  ;-)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>He learned from C.C. Sabathia, as can be seen <a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://i.a.cnn.net/si/2005/fantasy/08/04/mailbag/p1_sabathia.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2005/fantasy/08/04/mailbag/index.html&amp;h=400&amp;w=300&amp;sz=38&amp;hl=en&amp;start=7&amp;tbnid=UPOejak3z92rlM:&amp;tbnh=124&amp;tbnw=93&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dcc%2Bsabathia%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DN" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riff</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-12870</link>
		<dc:creator>Riff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 07:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-12870</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;12866&quot;]I like the Seahawks&#039; uniforms!  They are distinct and instantly identifiable with just one team, for a few reasons:

1.  They basically invented a new color.  Not only have I never seen a football uniform that was that shade before, I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve seen &lt;em&gt;anything&lt;/em&gt; that was that shade before.  (And I like the color.)

2.  They are committed to the monochrome look.  It&#039;s annoying when teams keep mixing and matching their uniforms the way Oregon or many of the teams in the NFL do.  But the Seahawks have never done that (except when hot weather makes it better to wear the white pants).  I think they are the only NFL team that has made monochrome uniforms their normal look.  And because of that, they have a unique identity.  If they used the white pants, they&#039;d look too much like the Eagles.

3.  Their uniforms are not cluttered messes like the ones the Bengals and Bills wear.  (The Bills are a double offender because their new colors are a ripoff of the Texans.)  Simpler is better.

I&#039;ll be surprised if anyone agrees with me, but that&#039;s my honest opinion![/quote]


Agreed.  110%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">NMK said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-12866"><p>
I like the Seahawks&#8217; uniforms!  They are distinct and instantly identifiable with just one team, for a few reasons:</p>
<p>1.  They basically invented a new color.  Not only have I never seen a football uniform that was that shade before, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve seen <em>anything</em> that was that shade before.  (And I like the color.)</p>
<p>2.  They are committed to the monochrome look.  It&#8217;s annoying when teams keep mixing and matching their uniforms the way Oregon or many of the teams in the NFL do.  But the Seahawks have never done that (except when hot weather makes it better to wear the white pants).  I think they are the only NFL team that has made monochrome uniforms their normal look.  And because of that, they have a unique identity.  If they used the white pants, they&#8217;d look too much like the Eagles.</p>
<p>3.  Their uniforms are not cluttered messes like the ones the Bengals and Bills wear.  (The Bills are a double offender because their new colors are a ripoff of the Texans.)  Simpler is better.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be surprised if anyone agrees with me, but that&#8217;s my honest opinion!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Agreed.  110%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minna H</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-12868</link>
		<dc:creator>Minna H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 05:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-12868</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;12866&quot;]I like the Seahawks&#039; uniforms!  They are distinct and instantly identifiable with just one team, for a few reasons:

1.  They basically invented a new color.  Not only have I never seen a football uniform that was that shade before, I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve seen &lt;em&gt;anything&lt;/em&gt; that was that shade before.  (And I like the color.)

[/quote]

I get seasick just looking at them, but then again, I&#039;m a Vikings&#039; fan.  I&#039;m used to uniforms that induce nausea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">NMK said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-12866"><p>
I like the Seahawks&#8217; uniforms!  They are distinct and instantly identifiable with just one team, for a few reasons:</p>
<p>1.  They basically invented a new color.  Not only have I never seen a football uniform that was that shade before, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve seen <em>anything</em> that was that shade before.  (And I like the color.)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I get seasick just looking at them, but then again, I&#8217;m a Vikings&#8217; fan.  I&#8217;m used to uniforms that induce nausea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-12867</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 05:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-12867</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;12761&quot;][quote comment=&quot;12758&quot;]Anybody else disappointed that locker room celebrations are now &lt;a href=&quot;http://espn-i.starwave.com/media/apphoto/0f2d08df-ee46-4463-be15-4eead8072b95.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SPONSORED!?!?!&lt;/a&gt;[/quote]

Of course the owners would probably not want the Cards celebrating with any other beverage...[/quote]

Anheuser-Busch hasn&#039;t been a part of the Cardinals ownership group for more than 10 years now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header">Chris Doran said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-12761">
<p class="quoter_comment_header">Chris Doran said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-12758"><p>
Anybody else disappointed that locker room celebrations are now <a href="http://espn-i.starwave.com/media/apphoto/0f2d08df-ee46-4463-be15-4eead8072b95.jpg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">SPONSORED!?!?!</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Of course the owners would probably not want the Cards celebrating with any other beverage&#8230;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Anheuser-Busch hasn&#8217;t been a part of the Cardinals ownership group for more than 10 years now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NMK</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-12866</link>
		<dc:creator>NMK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 04:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-12866</guid>
		<description>I like the Seahawks&#039; uniforms!  They are distinct and instantly identifiable with just one team, for a few reasons:

1.  They basically invented a new color.  Not only have I never seen a football uniform that was that shade before, I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve seen &lt;em&gt;anything&lt;/em&gt; that was that shade before.  (And I like the color.)

2.  They are committed to the monochrome look.  It&#039;s annoying when teams keep mixing and matching their uniforms the way Oregon or many of the teams in the NFL do.  But the Seahawks have never done that (except when hot weather makes it better to wear the white pants).  I think they are the only NFL team that has made monochrome uniforms their normal look.  And because of that, they have a unique identity.  If they used the white pants, they&#039;d look too much like the Eagles.

3.  Their uniforms are not cluttered messes like the ones the Bengals and Bills wear.  (The Bills are a double offender because their new colors are a ripoff of the Texans.)  Simpler is better.


I&#039;ll be surprised if anyone agrees with me, but that&#039;s my honest opinion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the Seahawks&#8217; uniforms!  They are distinct and instantly identifiable with just one team, for a few reasons:</p>
<p>1.  They basically invented a new color.  Not only have I never seen a football uniform that was that shade before, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve seen <em>anything</em> that was that shade before.  (And I like the color.)</p>
<p>2.  They are committed to the monochrome look.  It&#8217;s annoying when teams keep mixing and matching their uniforms the way Oregon or many of the teams in the NFL do.  But the Seahawks have never done that (except when hot weather makes it better to wear the white pants).  I think they are the only NFL team that has made monochrome uniforms their normal look.  And because of that, they have a unique identity.  If they used the white pants, they&#8217;d look too much like the Eagles.</p>
<p>3.  Their uniforms are not cluttered messes like the ones the Bengals and Bills wear.  (The Bills are a double offender because their new colors are a ripoff of the Texans.)  Simpler is better.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be surprised if anyone agrees with me, but that&#8217;s my honest opinion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-12865</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 04:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2006/10/09/division-series-roundup/#comment-12865</guid>
		<description>The Broncos don&#039;t wear the orange alternate uniforms anymore because every time they wore them at home for either Sunday Night or Monday Night Football they lost.  Maybe they&#039;ll try them again sometime, but I doubt it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Broncos don&#8217;t wear the orange alternate uniforms anymore because every time they wore them at home for either Sunday Night or Monday Night Football they lost.  Maybe they&#8217;ll try them again sometime, but I doubt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
